Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-21 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:23:50AM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote: > It is not a defect when the LFS book only currently supports a 32-bit > platform. > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/prologue/hostreqs.html: > "This version of the book builds a 32-bit Linux system and requires an >

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:31:27PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Just 500 when less than 20 will do. You will be much more likely to get help > if > you show that you have done some analysis on your own. > > BTW, this should be sent to lfs-support. > >-- Bruce Apologies, I thought lfs-dev w

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Chris R. Jones wrote: > > Why did you feel compelled to dump an entire log instead of just the relevant > part? Because the parts that are irrelevent to some are of importance to others. The full log was just 500 lines

e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
Hi, I'm trying to use the latest book (LFS-BOOK-SVN-20090718.pdf). I get to chapter 6.20 without any problems, and then when doing "make check" on e2fsprogs-1.41.8, I see 4 test failures. I'm building on x86_64. The tests appear to be getting segmentation faults. Is this a known problem? Any w