Hi all,
I am searching for the latest uname kernel module
hack for kernel 2.6.x, but couldn't find it. Maybe someone can
give me a hint where to download that nice stuff.
regards Bernd
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe:
Hi,Maybe we can clarify and include this stuff ...check it out ...Bernd Feldmeier wrote:> a) dependency of kernel version and linux-libc-header versionNone whatsoever. These are two different packages, with two differentreasons for existing.l-l-h is based on the kernel headers, but you can
Maybe we can clarify this stuff ...check it out ...Bernd Feldmeier wrote:> a) dependency of kernel version and linux-libc-header versionNone whatsoever. These are two different packages, with two differentreasons for existing.l-l-h is based on the kernel headers, but you can use any vers
Hi guys,
nice discussion about that very important stuff.
I began this discussion earlier ...
So maybe someone could clarify this stuff clearly ...
a) dependency of kernel version and linux-libc-header version
b) problems occuring
c) real meaning of sanatized headers (why ...)
d) creating our o
Hi to all,
sorry but as I know this release is bug fix release,
but this stuff has nothing to do with the
of any glibc/kernel stable versions. I think we should
upgrade to these stable versions before releasing ...
so we should use latest versions e.g. binutils 2.16.1 +
kernel 2.6.14.x + glibc
Hi,
maybe you can tell me why we don't include this versions in LFS 6.1.1
like Greg do it??
They are stable and so there should not be any problems??
PS: I think we are too conservative about that.
Please tell me ...
regards
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: htt
