>On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:26:35 +0100
>Igor Živković wrote:
> http://wizardofbits.tumblr.com/post/45232318557/systemd-more-like-shit-stemd
Nevermind the systemd flammage going on in here, the single most
important contribution of this article is that he *proposed an
alternative* in the form of run
>On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:35:03 +0100
>"Armin K." wrote:
> If an user logs via SSH or VNC or whatever that's not a "real
> console", logind won't grant such users permissions to use video
> card, audio device, cdrom, usb sticks, etc. I, for one, wouldn't want
> someone to access my cdrom device whe
>On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:55:30 +0100
>"Armin K." wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> After many months since lfs systemd branch was created, I am pleased
> to announce that I consider it being usable for everyone that wants
> to use it.
>
> I've managed to add missing bits to the branch today and doing t
>On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:52:19 -0700
>Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Yeah, there are a few packages I've run into that do "if config.guess
> says something that looks like x86_64, use lib64". Which is exactly
> the right thing to do for an x86_64 system, actually, but the standard
> autoconf macros don't
>On Fri, 31 May 2013 19:36:14 -0400
>Baho Utot wrote:
>
> On 05/31/2013 07:33 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > See, that just might work. If I can convince the rest of the
> > household to permanently open port 80 (or whatever) on the router,
>
>On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:39:25 +0200
>"Armin K." wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2013 12:27 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Is there any interest in LFS for the Pi?
> >
> > -- Bruce
> >
Yes, absolutely. However, think as much as I can, I can not think of
anything to DO with the Pi. And, in g
>On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:23:43 -0500
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I've finally figured out what is making the mangle33.C program fail.
> It is an arbitrary limitation in tcl. This particular gcc test
> creates a c++ namespace *name* of 4044 characters in length. It
> turns out that there is a value
>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:38:59 +0100
>Paige Thompson wrote:
> I'm sorry :( I think you wrote a response just before mine and Im
> really sorry ... Im tired, my hormones are all messed up and my cat
> won't stop meowing and Im going crazy not because of this or anybody
> on the list... I need to re
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:16:10 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > On 02/02/2012 15:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> I have another reason to dislike fedora. I wanted to look at what
> >> environment variables were used and did a simple 'set' command. I
> >> got a bunch of garbage
>On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:54:05 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Do we need systemd, a complex compiled system, to boot? My LFS boots
> in 8 seconds now. Is that too long?
You mean from the moment GRUB (or whatever) starts running to the login
prompt of some sort right?
(Man writes a long mail in wh
>On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:46:19 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Sigh.
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0OTY
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
>
>-- Bruce
I have to say I find this hilarious.
As I was reading the freedesktop page,
ng
November).
BTW, I noticed the bug accidentally, while checking the mail before
going to bed.
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tat() since it's a static/inline
@@ -461,3 +461,8 @@
libswanted="$libswanted pthread"
;;
esac
+
+locincpth=""
+loclibpth=""
+glibpth="${prefix}/lib"
+usrinc="${prefix}/include"
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
S, and then spawn the offspring 32bit
subsystem. This is due to a number of assumptions Glibc (I think.. or
either GCC or Binutils) makes on the positions of it's components.
Yeah, I think it was something about /usr/lib/crti.o and friends.
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
a link for the man page,
> no sign of any reported errors.
>
> ĸen
Funny, there is no trace of peekfd on my system. Not even in the logs.
Just rebuilt, with 22.12, and still no sign of peekfd..
--
-Aleksandar Kuktin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:42:58 -0600
>Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> > ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will
> > be easier for me to solve some problems.
> >
> > For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased
> > with knowing
16 matches
Mail list logo
