Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 18:22 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> I didn't spot it because it's in the middle of the log, and I
>> believed the message at the end -
>> 533 Tests in 117 Categories Complete ... No Failures :-)
>> but yes, I've got the same on the one build I logged.
>
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 18:22 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I didn't spot it because it's in the middle of the log, and I
> believed the message at the end -
> 533 Tests in 117 Categories Complete ... No Failures :-)
> but yes, I've got the same on the one build I logged.
Not that it matters much now
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:41:52 -0500, Bruce Dubbs
> > wrote:
> >> I just ran jhalfs against the latest files and had one anomaly in the
> >> new make-4.0 checks:
> >>
> >> functions/file ..
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:41:52 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I just ran jhalfs against the latest files and had one anomaly in the
>> new make-4.0 checks:
>>
>> functions/file ..
>> *** Test died (functions/file): Opened read-only file!
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:41:52 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I just ran jhalfs against the latest files and had one anomaly in the
> new make-4.0 checks:
>
> functions/file ..
> *** Test died (functions/file): Opened read-only file!
>
> FAILED (2/2 passed)
> -
