On Aug 3, 2013, at 12:24, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> Not much out there even looks for the lib64 folder
Greetings,
Except the linker when using gcc which will default to m64 during x86_64 builds
and use lib64 unless LFS is made to be a pure 64bit system and adjust gcc specs
config to use lib o
We have reached a milestone. The SVN versions of both LFS and BLFS are
now up to date. There are no major outstanding issues that need to be
fixed.
There are a couple of minor changes that I have to LFS, but those will
be committed soon, but are not critical. KDE is slightly out of date,
but
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Michael E. Maher
wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 07:53 +0200, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> >On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:52:19 -0700
>> >Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>
>> > Yeah, there are a few packages I've run into that do "if config.guess
>> > says something that looks like x
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 07:53 +0200, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> >On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:52:19 -0700
> >Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> > Yeah, there are a few packages I've run into that do "if config.guess
> > says something that looks like x86_64, use lib64". Which is exactly
> > the right thing to do
