Re: [lfs-dev] tzdata2013c.tar.gz md5 not match

2013-04-24 Thread xinglp
Sorry, my mistake. It's the proxy I used changed somethings. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-dev] tzdata2013c.tar.gz md5 not match

2013-04-24 Thread xinglp
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] Interesting observation

2013-04-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 24/04/2013 22:01, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> It's been less than two months since we released LFS-7.3. >> >> 18/61 packages have been updated since then including binutils, gcc, >> kernel, kmod, and udev. >> >> Can glibc be far behind? > According to http://sourceware.org

Re: [lfs-dev] Interesting observation

2013-04-24 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 24/04/2013 22:01, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > It's been less than two months since we released LFS-7.3. > > 18/61 packages have been updated since then including binutils, gcc, > kernel, kmod, and udev. > > Can glibc be far behind? > >-- Bruce According to http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Gl

[lfs-dev] Interesting observation

2013-04-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
It's been less than two months since we released LFS-7.3. 18/61 packages have been updated since then including binutils, gcc, kernel, kmod, and udev. Can glibc be far behind? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscr