Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > The ticket would be to take your words "we stay with that until after > the next LFS release (March) and then re-evaluate" and remember them on > February/March for the the release. Again, would it be good to open such > a ticket just to remember? I would prefer not

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em seg, 17/12/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements > Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Data: Segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2012, 13:49 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > --- Em seg, 17/12/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > > >> By far, th

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em seg, 17/12/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> By far, the biggest problem is having the wrong symlink for >> /bin/sh. I >> recently highlighted the symlink issue in Section 5.3 of >> SVN. I suggest >> we stay with that until after the next LFS release (March) >> an

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em seg, 17/12/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements > Para: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Data: Segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2012, 13:13 > Chris Staub wrote: > > On 12/17/2012 06:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >> > >> I see two

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Chris Staub wrote: > On 12/17/2012 06:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> I see two modifications, one easy to do, the other is perhaps >> impossible. >> >> 1. Change the position of the gcc, so it is not in the beginning nor the >> end of the tests. >> 2. Have a conclusion statement: "x tests

Re: [lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/17/2012 06:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > I see two modifications, one easy to do, the other is perhaps > impossible. > > 1. Change the position of the gcc, so it is not in the beginning nor the > end of the tests. > 2. Have a conclusion statement: "x tests passed, y tests failed, if

[lfs-dev] Host System Requirements

2012-12-17 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Problems recur here. Reasons are many. I have been caught here, not only once. Bruce and Matt have made very good, no, excellent improvements recently. Further, the script is perhaps, IMHO, one of the most important parts of the book, perhaps the second more important achievement of LFS developers,

Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement

2012-12-17 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Kevin Lyda" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Lundi 17 Décembre 2012 09:44:00 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > There are a few issues here. First, they are not releasing

Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Lyda
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > There are a few issues here. First, they are not releasing a tarball. > We would have to make our own. They don't have to release a tarball if they're doing development on github: wget https://github.com/gentoo/eudev/tarball/master -O eudev.