Re: [lfs-dev] Once more: Package Management

2012-05-21 Thread Armin K.
On 05/22/2012 01:27 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > > It omits the core point of LFS...education. I dislike providing binary > packages to users, but a working example of how to create those binary > packages is something we've lacked for a long time, plus getting those > packages that don't honor DESTDIR ex

Re: [lfs-dev] Once more: Package Management

2012-05-21 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/20/2012 04:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Seems my phone ate my previous response...easier to type on a real keyboard anyway. > OK, then what's wrong with a tarball of binaries that we have created > for this purpose? There could be a tarball of the base LFS system and > then additional tarball