On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 23:12:16 +0100
> Matt Burgess wrote:
>
>
> > This is upstream bug 13579
> > (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13579) and the
> > attached patch should fix it. Would you mind giving it a try plea
On Tue, 01 May 2012 23:12:16 +0100
Matt Burgess wrote:
> This is upstream bug 13579
> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13579) and the
> attached patch should fix it. Would you mind giving it a try please?
>
The patch attached to that bug is essentially the same as the one I
a
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 06:14:40PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas de Roo wrote:
> >
> >
> > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > Van:Ken Moffat
> > Verzonden:di 01-05-2012 23:14
> > Onderwerp:Re: [lfs-dev] Broken sound (glibc).
> > Aan:LFS Developers Mailinglist ;
> >
> > Let's rephrase
Thomas de Roo wrote:
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van:Ken Moffat
> Verzonden:di 01-05-2012 23:14
> Onderwerp:Re: [lfs-dev] Broken sound (glibc).
> Aan:LFS Developers Mailinglist ;
>
> Let's rephrase that - can people running LFS-svn with glibc-2.15, and who
> have installed alsa-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Ken Moffat
Verzonden:di 01-05-2012 23:14
Onderwerp:Re: [lfs-dev] Broken sound (glibc).
Aan:LFS Developers Mailinglist ;
Let's rephrase that - can people running LFS-svn with glibc-2.15, and who
have installed alsa-utils, try running aplay or speaker-test
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 22:48 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Thanks. I too had assumed that process for recent glibc. Perhaps
> we misunderstood upstream's opinion of the problem, or maybe their
> branch managers work slightly differently. Hopefully, asking
> questions will no longer get the "use yo
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 22:10 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Also, anyone know why we dropped this ? I see that it is
> > supposedly already in upstream (described as 'from upstream' for
> > 2.14.1)
>
> That was precisely the reason
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 22:10 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Also, anyone know why we dropped this ? I see that it is
> supposedly already in upstream (described as 'from upstream' for
> 2.14.1)
That was precisely the reason why I dropped it. We took a new upstream
version and I assumed their patchi
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:22:01PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 20:05:54 +0100
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> >
> > Google found that *some* people have been hitting this since
> > glibc-2.14. It also pointed me to a patch at cross-lfs,
> > http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/eglibc
On Tue, 01 May 2012 20:05:54 +0100
Ken Moffat wrote:
> My shiny new LFS system is heading for /dev/null. That's ok, it
> was only a test of current packages, but I must admit I'd hoped to
> keep it for a week or two.
>
> The reason is that although I've built everything except for some
> gnom
Armin K. wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 07:40 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>> Today I've finished updating and checking all of Gnome 3.4 components
>>> and everything was ok. It's up to you people to test it and find bugs in
>>> the book/instructions or the packages itself. I'll be updating i
My shiny new LFS system is heading for /dev/null. That's ok, it
was only a test of current packages, but I must admit I'd hoped to
keep it for a week or two.
The reason is that although I've built everything except for some
gnome packages, I didn't test sound until last night. Totally
broken.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:07:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:12:10AM +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 04:59 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > As I said originally, this was a new failure for me. And also, the
> > > sed doesn't seem to fix it.
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
