Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 00:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen > this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off > or perhaps something in the 3.3.4 headers has changed. There's a sed in the book to avoid the test fail

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > Thanks. It wasn't known to me and it didn't fail from the same > script, invoked in the same way, using the 20120419 or 20120425 > books, or indeed 7.1. Coreutils was one of those packages where > it was hard to miss failures in the testsuite. test-getlogin was not in coreu

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:54:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I'm assuming this is from gnulib-tests/test-getlogin.c. Not seen > > this failure in my builds earlier this week, perhaps it's a one-off > > or perhaps something in the 3.3.4 headers has changed. > > > > O

Re: [lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > (resending, hopefully I've got the right list this time) > > I'm building the current book with the newer grep, man-pages, > kernel-headers, and autofoo that Matt is working on. This is as a > test of my hardware (looking good at the moment, but a few BLFS > packages have ca

[lfs-dev] New failure in coreutils tests

2012-04-28 Thread Ken Moffat
(resending, hopefully I've got the right list this time) I'm building the current book with the newer grep, man-pages, kernel-headers, and autofoo that Matt is working on. This is as a test of my hardware (looking good at the moment, but a few BLFS packages have caused me ICEs recently, so not