Re: [lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 2/7/12 12:38 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > lsmod is in /bin. The rest in /sbin. Wow, really need to get my eyes checked. OK, thanks. JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 2/7/12 12:21 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: >> Um, it's not missing. It's not in this list, correct: >> >>> for target in depmod insmod modinfo modprobe rmmod; do >>>ln -sv ../bin/kmod /sbin/$target >>> done >> But it is here, one line below: >> >>> ln -sv kmod /bin/lsmod

Re: [lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 2/7/12 12:21 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Um, it's not missing. It's not in this list, correct: > >> for target in depmod insmod modinfo modprobe rmmod; do >>ln -sv ../bin/kmod /sbin/$target >> done > > But it is here, one line below: > >> ln -sv kmod /bin/lsmod > > :-) Oh, odd. I totally mi

Re: [lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:00:31 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork > wrote: >> Was just reviewing your kmod build instructions - haven't built it yet >> myself, but it's noticeably missing lsmod - shouldn't this be another >> symlink to kmod? > > Yup, if you look closely you'll notice

Re: [lfs-dev] Plans for LFS-7.1

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
William Tracy wrote: > If the plans to include initramfs go forward, would those be targeted for > 8.0? We wouldn't do those before 7.1, but I'm inclined to put the initramfs instructions into BLFS and forward reference that in LFS for those that want to do that. I definately would not recommen

Re: [blfs-dev] the date in the book

2012-02-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > When I was previously editing here, I was persuaded that the date > in the BLFS book should be the date it would next be rendered > online. From memory, Bruce has a cron job to do that in the morning, > in his timezone. So, when I came back here, I've mostly tried to > adhere

[blfs-dev] the date in the book

2012-02-06 Thread Ken Moffat
When I was previously editing here, I was persuaded that the date in the BLFS book should be the date it would next be rendered online. From memory, Bruce has a cron job to do that in the morning, in his timezone. So, when I came back here, I've mostly tried to adhere to that. But, I notice tha

Re: [lfs-dev] Plans for LFS-7.1

2012-02-06 Thread William Tracy
If the plans to include initramfs go forward, would those be targeted for 8.0? William Tracy afishion...@gmail.com Cell phone: (805) 704-0917 Internet phone: (707) 206-6441 On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We are starting to plan for LFS-7.1. We are anticipating an -rc1

Re: [lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:00:31 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Was just reviewing your kmod build instructions - haven't built it yet > myself, but it's noticeably missing lsmod - shouldn't this be another > symlink to kmod? Yup, if you look closely you'll notice I added it to the list of installe

Re: [lfs-dev] The case of libgmpxx

2012-02-06 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 06/02/2012 00:32, Andrew Benton a écrit : > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:01:30 +0100 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> If I understand the xxx.la files, they are used by libtool to find >> libraries. I am certainly missing something, but I do not understand >> why changing tools to usr in libstdc++.la wo

[lfs-dev] kmod missing lsmod

2012-02-06 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Was just reviewing your kmod build instructions - haven't built it yet myself, but it's noticeably missing lsmod - shouldn't this be another symlink to kmod? JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above informati