Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-10 Thread Markku Pesonen
On 10.1.2012 4:22, Ken Moffat wrote: > For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me, > NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going > to happen: > > in LFS - nothing! Matt spotted that iproute2 only uses the > headers, it doesn't link against the lib.

Re: [lfs-dev] lvm hint

2012-01-10 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Following up since we took debugging off-list... The root issue here was that the kernel didn't have initramfs support enabled. So even when grub loaded the initrafms image, the kernel didn't try to use it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma

Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-10 Thread Andrew Benton
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:15:19 +0100 Olaf wrote: > FWIW: libnl-3.2.3 proved quite an interesting 'change', I've needed to > tweak several packages (hostapd to name one) to deal with the move of > header files :-( Could you tell me how you built hostapd with libnl-3.2.3? I've just taken the easy

Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-10 Thread Olaf
Ken, > in BLFS, I'll be adding libnl-3.2.3 when I (eventually) merge > Wayne's gnome-3 changes. The headers in -3 have moved one level > deeper, and a quick attempt to use them for iproute2 by editing the > includes in ip2/ipl2tpc from netlink/ to libnl3/netlink/ failed > because the first of t