Re: [lfs-dev] util-=linux and coreutils arch

2012-01-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > Hello, > >>From the trivial detail department; we configure util-linux > with --enable-arch, however, on the man page for arch I see: > > DESCRIPTION >arch is a deprecated command since util-linux 2.13. Use uname -m or >use arch from the GNU coreutils pa

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS7.0

2012-01-04 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Sure, it's a requirement, but if it isn't there, then the check for >> libc fails. Right now, the resources needed are head, cut, echo, >> readlink, and cat; other than the resources being directly tested. >> >> I just do

Re: [lfs-dev] lvm hint

2012-01-04 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Baho Utot wrote: > I am not looking for something too complicated, All I need is to be > able to boot into lvm with minimal trouble. Sounds like either way might work? dracut will require work on the bootscripts, while my setup won't, however... > Will your system work with LFS7.0 or just 6.8?

Re: [lfs-dev] use of sysroot with gcc?

2012-01-04 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 30/12/2011 08:46, Alex a écrit : > I tried using it myself and saw odd behavior when using sysroot with a > native gcc. The library search path ended up being /SYSROOT/ABSOLUTE/lib/ > instead of /SYSROOT/lib when the 'lib' directory was located at > /ABSOLUTE/lib. I added a 'hack' syml

Re: [lfs-dev] lvm hint

2012-01-04 Thread Baho Utot
On 01/03/2012 10:20 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:36:18PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: On 01/03/2012 03:44 PM, Ren? GARCIA wrote: Hi, I am using LFS 7.0 with LVM2/ext4 for all partitions excepted /boot which is a primary partition using ext4. I haven't followed the Bryan Kadzb