Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 17-12-2011 01:06, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> A simple alternative would be to just put the compilation test first.
>> When we first wrote the script, we didn't have the compilation test at
>> all, so when it was added, it was put at the end.
>>
>>-- Bruce
>
> I lik
On 17-12-2011 01:06, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> A simple alternative would be to just put the compilation test first.
> When we first wrote the script, we didn't have the compilation test at
> all, so when it was added, it was put at the end.
>
>-- Bruce
I liked this solution.
Thanks, Bruce.
And
