Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Since the only thing in LFS that requires pkg-config is E2fsprogs, the
>> easiest thing would be to patch the E2fsprogs build mechanism to remove
>> the dependency on pkg-config and then remove PCRE, Glib, and Pkg
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Since the only thing in LFS that requires pkg-config is E2fsprogs, the
> easiest thing would be to patch the E2fsprogs build mechanism to remove
> the dependency on pkg-config and then remove PCRE, Glib, and Pkg-config
> and defer
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:47:52PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember
> > some discussion, but I forget why we did it
>
> pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember
>> some discussion, but I forget why we did it
>
> pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that it
> used to bundle, therefore forcing us t
On 27/09/2011 22:35, Ken Moffat wrote:
> With respect, Matt, it's the glib2 part that is bloat. I remember
> some discussion, but I forget why we did it
pkg-config upstream, as of 0.26, removed the internal Glib-1 that it
used to bundle, therefore forcing us to install a system-wide copy and
a
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:24:50PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream:
>
> Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's
> a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." H
On 27/09/2011 20:24, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream:
>
> Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's
> a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." However, that
> ChangeLog
On 27/09/2011 19:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, we're getting bloat inserted by upstream:
Looking at the ChangeLog, the root dependency is "Add Pkg-Config as it's
a pre-requisite of E2fsprogs' new configure switches." However, that
ChangeLog entry is within a whole bunch of Util-Linux changes,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:08:10PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote:
> >
> >> It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2
> > dependencies. libffi
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2
> dependencies. libffi has no dependencies itself, and Python has no
> mandatory dependencies, s
xinglp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Try this sed:
>>
>> sed -i -e 's/cflag \& (ECHO)/lflag \& ECHO/' term-utils/agetty.c
>
> shy
?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubsc
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> xinglp wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> See if this works as well:
>>>
>>> sed -i -e 's/(ECHO)/ECHO/' term-utils/agetty.c
>> It's "c_cflag --> c_lflag" .
>> Maybe you need to see a oculist
>
> I generally do
On 27/09/2011 18:09, Andrew Benton wrote:
> It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python.
Thanks for the heads up. I'm not actually that bothered by those 2
dependencies. libffi has no dependencies itself, and Python has no
mandatory dependencies, so it's only 2 packages that need to
Hello,
It seems that glib-2.30.0 requires libffi and python.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
xinglp wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> See if this works as well:
>>
>> sed -i -e 's/(ECHO)/ECHO/' term-utils/agetty.c
> It's "c_cflag --> c_lflag" .
> Maybe you need to see a oculist
I generally don't use a utf-8 character encoding, so your patch looks
like the
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> See if this works as well:
>
> sed -i -e 's/(ECHO)/ECHO/' term-utils/agetty.c
It's "c_cflag --> c_lflag" .
Maybe you need to see a oculist
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
> xinglp wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Karel Zak
>> D
16 matches
Mail list logo