Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:32:38 -0700, Bryan Kadzban
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:01:21PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> The purpose of this is to move a lot of things (.udev, etc) out of /dev
>>> and eventually will end up holding files presently on /var/run and
I like this change. Simplifying /var and removing things that don't really
belong in /dev sounds positive to me.
So if I'm understanding this correctly, /run will also eventually supersede
/var/run altogether. Should we consider a compatibility symlink?
Jonathan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:59:43AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:32:38 -0700, Bryan Kadzban
> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good to me. Thinking about this change recently, it's a lot less
> > scary than I thought originally, when looking at the various hotplug
> > threads and
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:32:38 -0700, Bryan Kadzban
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:01:21PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> The purpose of this is to move a lot of things (.udev, etc) out of /dev
>> and eventually will end up holding files presently on /var/run and
>> /var/lock.
>>
>> Though
