On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> * LSB Compliance - For LFS we are nearly there anyway.
>>>
>> So, since you have raised this, what do you think needs to be done
>> that is a major change ? More to the point, should we really care ?
>> I don't have any interest in lettin
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> * Multi-lib - Shunned previously, but there are many projects
>>> that expect this environment.
>>>
>> For people who build from source, which projects *expect* multilib
>> on x86_64 ?
>>
>> I will agree that building a bi-arch desktop (that is, both 32-bit
>> and 64-bit X
I've read about 15 messages on this topic and will try to incorporate
the relevant areas in my response.
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> Okay, so I was just thinking...
>> help us! I figure we have at least 6 months, potentially a year unti
Ken Moffat wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> * Multi-lib - Shunned previously, but there are many projects that
>> expect this environment.
> For people who build from source, which projects *expect* multilib on
>x86_64 ?
For me, Virtualbox and WINE. AOSP
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 19:02, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>>
>> The LSB bootscripts work similar to insserv on (newer) Debian and SuSE,
>> right?
>
> Yeah. Instead of hardcoding the symlink order as is done in the
> bootscripts Makefile, dependencies
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:45, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>>> * Dynamic boot script - No more static list of links, this kind of ties
>>> into LSB Bootscripts, but there are other options.
>
Robert Xu wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:45, Ken Moffat
>wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>>> * Dynamic boot script - No more static list of links, this kind of
>ties
>>> into LSB Bootscripts, but there are other options.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know what you
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:45, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> * Dynamic boot script - No more static list of links, this kind of ties
>> into LSB Bootscripts, but there are other options.
>>
>
> I don't know what you mean by this ? It's the firs
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:39:04PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Okay, so I was just thinking...
> help us! I figure we have at least 6 months, potentially a year until
> the next major LFS release, and now seems like a pretty good time to
> explore some of the ideas that have been shelved for
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:39:04 -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Okay, so I was just thinking...
> help us! I figure we have at least 6 months, potentially a year until
> the next major LFS release, and now seems like a pretty good time to
> explore some of the ideas that have been shelved for previous rele
10 matches
Mail list logo
