Re: cvs bug

2010-08-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
雷智 wrote: > Hi, > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23' > Making all in lib > make[2]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23/lib' > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -g -O2 -MT getline.o -MD -MP -MF > .deps/getline.Tpo -c -o getline.o getline.

cvs bug

2010-08-08 Thread 雷智
Hi, make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23' Making all in lib make[2]: Entering directory `/blfs-sources/cvs-1.11.23/lib' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -g -O2 -MT getline.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/getline.Tpo -c -o getline.o getline.c In file included from

peekfd on x86_64

2010-08-08 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hello, Anyone else notice that psmisc-22.12 is not building and installing peekfd on x86_64? Apparently this is a known issue with an upstream fix: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3029302&group_id=15273&atid=115273 Jeremy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Rice
>> I guess BLFS would be the main target for this, as base LFS doesn't >> supply >> dependency information. If dependency information was found for packages >> in LFS, the system could be used there too. > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/appendices/dependencies.html > >-- Bruc

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Timothy Rice wrote: > I guess BLFS would be the main target for this, as base LFS doesn't supply > dependency information. If dependency information was found for packages > in LFS, the system could be used there too. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/appendices/dependencies.html

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Rice
Hi Bryan, > How do you propose, during package X's installation, to find which other > packages it depends on? It seems like that's a much bigger issue than > how to encode the dependencies. You are correct. At this stage, I am manually putting the list of dependencies into a text file. The pro

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Rice
Hi Drew, > 1) Is the idea to apply the dependency symlinks to packages beyond LFS? I guess BLFS would be the main target for this, as base LFS doesn't supply dependency information. If dependency information was found for packages in LFS, the system could be used there too. I've started implemen

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Timothy Rice wrote: > I was contemplating how to implement dependency tracking in the > Package User system and had an idea. Perhaps it would be of interest. > > <...> > > Opinions? Are there any obvious problems that I might have > overlooked? How do you propose, during package X's installation

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Drew Ames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/08/2010 03:41 AM, Timothy Rice wrote: > Hi everyone who is following this topic, > > I was contemplating how to implement dependency tracking in the Package > User system and had an idea. Perhaps it would be of interest. > > ---Snip--- > > What I

Re: Honing "Package Users" (Dependency Tracking)

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Rice
Hi everyone who is following this topic, I was contemplating how to implement dependency tracking in the Package User system and had an idea. Perhaps it would be of interest. Part of the beauty of the Package Users system is that it depends only on basic functionality that exists in every LFS sy