On 07/31/2010 08:08 PM, Kevin Buckley wrote:
> On 1 August 2010 09:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> BTW, I once (IIRC around 2004) made a suggestion to scan the filesystem
>> after each package and store information about each package's files in a
>> DB. That kinda begs the question about how you get
On 1 August 2010 09:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> BTW, I once (IIRC around 2004) made a suggestion to scan the filesystem
> after each package and store information about each package's files in a
> DB. That kinda begs the question about how you get a db installed for
> use. We really don't want to
On 1 August 2010 00:02, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
>
> I'm glad you like it, and that you got in there and dug around. I wish
> more people had done so. Of the ones that had passwords sent to them,
> only 4 or so actually logged in.
>
My inital feelings about the mail purporting to come from an
unlik
On 7/31/10 4:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I get the rejected links for almost all the lists daily. Typically
> there are 4 or 5 messages per list. There's a summary for each list
> every morning. I can delete them from the summary fairly quickly.
>
> In a way, it's interesting to see the identica
On 7/31/10 4:44 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Unfortunately, most times anyway, a proof of concept must come first
> before anybody will listen. Take for instance Jeremy's
> community.lfs.org site for which this thread started. Most of us agree
> that the website is looking a little tired, but it took th
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Finally, we provide a fail safe if somebody makes a mistake during the
> process. I speak from experience, starting over sucks! I know, and I'm
> pretty sure that everyone can remember the dreaded "It would be easier
> to start over" response from years ago in LFS-Support. I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2010 11:19 PM, Yaacov-Yoseph Weiss wrote:
>
> Not at all. I was suggesting tasks which the book could use in the
> future. The only thing I requested at the moment is was to gage
> interest in such direction.
I think that depends on the day
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 7/31/10 3:11 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> On 7/30/10 10:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Go ahead. I tried to get SPF to work once, but it didn't work for me.
>>> That was several years ago though.
>> Testing once more...
>
> Well, it seems greylisting is gone now, altho
On 7/31/10 3:11 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 7/30/10 10:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Go ahead. I tried to get SPF to work once, but it didn't work for me.
>> That was several years ago though.
>
> Testing once more...
Well, it seems greylisting is gone now, although for a little while
there m
On 7/30/10 10:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Go ahead. I tried to get SPF to work once, but it didn't work for me.
> That was several years ago though.
Testing once more...
Jeremy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
harrold hunt wrote:
> On 7/30/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build
>>> instructions
>>> should be appropriate to that version.
>> That needs to be reconsidered since LFS 6.7 will be out in about a month.
> If I can g
11 matches
Mail list logo
