Re: greylisting

2010-07-30 Thread harrold hunt
On 7/30/10, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Would anyone mind if we updated Postfix and killed the greylisting on > quantum? > > There are alternatives that would not have the same delay issue that > greylisting by nature causes. For example, I've been playing with SPF > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sen

Re: greylisting

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Would anyone mind if we updated Postfix and killed the greylisting on > quantum? > > There are alternatives that would not have the same delay issue that > greylisting by nature causes. For example, I've been playing with SPF > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_F

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread harrold hunt
On 7/30/10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build >> instructions >> should be appropriate to that version. > > That needs to be reconsidered since LFS 6.7 will be out in about a month. > >-- Bruce > -- > http://linuxfrom

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/30/2010 07:33 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build >> instructions >> should be appropriate to that version. > > That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active developers > are using 6.5. I am open t

greylisting

2010-07-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Would anyone mind if we updated Postfix and killed the greylisting on quantum? There are alternatives that would not have the same delay issue that greylisting by nature causes. For example, I've been playing with SPF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework). Jeremy -- http://lin

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Jul 30, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > That needs to be reconsidered since LFS 6.7 will be out in about a month. > Is one of the considerations to keep just one, current, BLFS book version, instead of producing releases? I know there's compatibility concerns with released versions o

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread Randy McMurchy
Ken Moffat wrote: > Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build > instructions > should be appropriate to that version. That should probably change now. I'm not sure any active developers are using 6.5. I am open to suggestions, but I feel BLFS may need to just simply targ

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > Just for the record, BLFS is still targetted at LFS-6.5, so build > instructions > should be appropriate to that version. That needs to be reconsidered since LFS 6.7 will be out in about a month. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread Ken Moffat
On 30 July 2010 21:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > harrold hunt wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to help out the LFS project in some way, preferably >> documentation which is the main part of the project. I'm not entirely >> sure what I could do. But I am interested in any contribution to help >> the

Re: Website

2010-07-30 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 7/25/10 2:13 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 07/24/2010 10:23 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> I set up a redmine installation on quantum. It has all the latest info >> merged over from trac (well, from earlier today), and it has a new look >> based on the design I showed earlier. It automatically creat

Re: How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
harrold hunt wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to help out the LFS project in some way, preferably > documentation which is the main part of the project. I'm not entirely > sure what I could do. But I am interested in any contribution to help > the project move forward. Where we really need help

Re: Broken link in dev

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:15:44 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> For the record, the way to get the testfiles is to go to > > > > Thanks Bruce. I cheated when I updated Udev last time by > simply renaming udev-158-testfiles.tar.bz2 to > udev-160-testfiles.tar.bz2 :) > > I

How can I contribute?

2010-07-30 Thread harrold hunt
Hello, I would like to help out the LFS project in some way, preferably documentation which is the main part of the project. I'm not entirely sure what I could do. But I am interested in any contribution to help the project move forward. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ

Re: Broken link in dev

2010-07-30 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:15:44 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > For the record, the way to get the testfiles is to go to Thanks Bruce. I cheated when I updated Udev last time by simply renaming udev-158-testfiles.tar.bz2 to udev-160-testfiles.tar.bz2 :) If the tarball you just uploaded was created

Re: Broken link in dev

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/other/udev-160-testfiles.tar.bz2 >> >> >> is non-existent. > > I'll fix that in a few minutes. Udev updates are a little more > difficult now that we added the testsuite. OK, it's in place now. For the r

Re: Broken link in dev

2010-07-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/other/udev-160-testfiles.tar.bz2 > > is non-existent. I'll fix that in a few minutes. Udev updates are a little more difficult now that we added the testsuite. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d