iproute2 text nitpick

2010-04-01 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Just a small nitpick. The Iproute2 page says: "The arpd binary included in this package is dependent..." That sounds like there is actually a compiled binary shipped in the package. Might be better worded as something like: "The arpd binary produced through this package..." -- JH -- http://li

Re: Bzip2 version mismatch

2010-04-01 Thread Robert Xu
On 4/1/2010 5:42 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Will you please create a ticket. >> > Sure. > > >> Have you reported this upstream? >> > Nope, not yet. Although I saw that the issue was reported to Debian's Bug > Tracking site

Re: Bzip2 version mismatch

2010-04-01 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Will you please create a ticket. Sure. > Have you reported this upstream? Nope, not yet. Although I saw that the issue was reported to Debian's Bug Tracking site in December. They don't appear to have touched it yet though. (Unless I'm missin

Re: Bzip2 version mismatch

2010-04-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Hi All, > > I don't know if anyone ever noticed this, but the library version installed > with bzip2-1.0.5 > is still 1.0.4. Also, the man pages still say 1.0.4. Seems like the > maintainer just forgot > to update the Makefile and man sections. > > Since everything stil

Bzip2 version mismatch

2010-04-01 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hi All, I don't know if anyone ever noticed this, but the library version installed with bzip2-1.0.5 is still 1.0.4. Also, the man pages still say 1.0.4. Seems like the maintainer just forgot to update the Makefile and man sections. Since everything still works as it should, I suppose this is r