On Saturday, March 13, 2010, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>
> Fixed, thanks.
>
> I do have a some continuing problems in typing where I get characters
> transposed. form->from, 'th etype'->'the type', etc. I try to
> proofread, but don't always catch the errors. The spelling checker
> he
On 13/03/10 22:50, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> OK, I see:
>
> GNU C Library (EGLIBC) stable release version 2.10.1
>
> This, according to google,
>
> Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) is a variant of the GNU C Library (GLIBC) that
> is designed to work well on embedded systems. EGLIBC strives to be
> source and bi
stosss wrote:
Fixed, thanks.
I do have a some continuing problems in typing where I get characters
transposed. form->from, 'th etype'->'the type', etc. I try to
proofread, but don't always catch the errors. The spelling checker
helps, but things like 'form' are valid words.
Pointing out t
Tobias Gasser wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Can you paste the output from version-check.sh and uname -a please.
>>
>> Did you install xubuntu or just run from the CD?
>>
> both.
>
> sorry for my late response, but i'm currently running some more test
> with different setups and i will put the
Linux From Scratch - Version 6.6
Chapter 8. Making the LFS System Bootable
8.4. Using GRUB to Set Up the Boot Process
8.4.1. Introduction
3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence, change he to the
- The hard drive number starts from zero, but he partition number
starts from one for normal partitions and fiv
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Can you paste the output from version-check.sh and uname -a please.
>
> Did you install xubuntu or just run from the CD?
>
both.
sorry for my late response, but i'm currently running some more test
with different setups and i will put the logfiles on this page:
http://s37
On 13/03/10 14:03, Robert Xu wrote:
> I've just had my inbox filled with flame wars over this discussion,
> just for a simple grammar correction.
> Just make a decision. Please.
I think you'll find a decision has been made:
On 09/03/10 16:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> No, this is really correct as is
O
On Mar 13, 2010, at 6:49, +Jan wrote:
> -snip-
>
> I was trying to bring the discussion back to this. Sorry if I
> offended you, but I just thought this wasn't going anywhere. I
> finished reading your post and I now understand that you're irritated
> because you feel like your opinion is be
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas
wrote:
>> >
>> > I stopped reading right here. It is their book.
>
> Absolutely disagree.
>
> This book doesn't belong to none specific. It has been written to show
> to the world how to make a usable operating system from plain sources
On Sat, Mar 13, at 03:37 stosss wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, +Jan wrote:
> >
> > I stopped reading right here. It is their book.
Absolutely disagree.
This book doesn't belong to none specific. It has been written to show
to the world how to make a usable operating system from plain
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, +Jan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:47 PM, stosss wrote:
>>
>> Writing UNIX wrong isn't a violation of grammar. Getting grammar wrong
>> shows a lack of knowledge and understanding of the language and that
>> reflects poorly on the writer.
>>
>> What I find re
11 matches
Mail list logo
