On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:00:57 +, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> What's your recommendation then? Pass '-j1' on the command line for all
> 'make install' invocations?
That's probably overkill. All I know is I've previously been burnt by
both GCC and Glibc with `-j3' on 2 cores. And considering the i
Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> Also, for the people that will run an initramfs for whatever reason,
> this will make it much simpler, not having to put udev in there.
No, you still need udev.
devtmpfs does *not* give you /dev/disk/by-{label,uuid}, which are
required for device name stability.
devtmpf
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> We might also
> consider using the environment variable CONFIG_SITE to cache configure
> settings. E.g.
>
> export CONFIG_SITE=/home/lfs/config.site
>
> # /home/lfs/config.site for configure
>
> # Give Autoconf 2.x generated configure scripts a shared de
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
>> now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
>>
>> There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
>> Linux-2.6.32 which has been design
Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:00:41 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
>
>> Much more clever would be to mention MAKEFLAGS in the intro somewhere,
>> and add -j1 as needed for the packages that don't support parallel make.
>
> Exactly as currently done in DIY Linux.
>
>> This is what I
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Mark Rosenstand wrote:
>>
>> Much more clever would be to mention MAKEFLAGS in the intro somewhere,
>> and add -j1 as needed for the packages that don't support parallel make.
>> This is what I do in my build scripts, and out of >1300 source packages,
>> I've only had to enforc
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
> now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
>
> There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
> Linux-2.6.32 which has been designated for long term support.
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:00:41 +0100, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> Much more clever would be to mention MAKEFLAGS in the intro somewhere,
> and add -j1 as needed for the packages that don't support parallel make.
Exactly as currently done in DIY Linux.
> This is what I do in my build scripts, and out
Mark Rosenstand wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 00:20 +, Greg Schafer wrote:
>> (Sidenote: Any plans for LFS to incorporate parallel make into the build?
>> Seems like a gaping omission in this day and age of commonplace multicore
>> cpu's. At the very minimum, Glibc, GCC and Binutils should b
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 14:56 -0700, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Nathan Coulson wrote:
> >> I noted that the linux kernel is working on a system called devtmpfs.
> >>>From what I have read, it mount's a tmpfs, then populates it (Giving
> >> us con
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 00:20 +, Greg Schafer wrote:
> (Sidenote: Any plans for LFS to incorporate parallel make into the build?
> Seems like a gaping omission in this day and age of commonplace multicore
> cpu's. At the very minimum, Glibc, GCC and Binutils should be given the
> option of `ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
