Ted Feng wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I registered an account in 'http://trac.cross-lfs.org/' a couple days ago.
> And an error showed up which I didn't notice.
Cross-lfs has their own mailing list. The main lfs site does not manage
it. Try posting to the cross-lfs mailing list.
-- Bruce
--
http://li
Hi:
I registered an account in 'http://trac.cross-lfs.org/' a couple days ago.
And an error showed up which I didn't notice.
Today I tried to login in, got this
Oops…
Trac detected an internal error:
SMTPException: SMTP AUTH extension not supported by server.
There was an internal error in Tra
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will be
> easier for me to solve some problems.
>
> For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased with
> knowing precisely this. It will help me to see my translation strategy
> among
ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will be
easier for me to solve some problems.
For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased with
knowing precisely this. It will help me to see my translation strategy
among complex lfs world :)
Last question (sti
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Just a precision because, beyond translating, I manage a French help
> network too. Can you tell me, and I think it could be precised in the
> book or on the website, what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
> with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 3
Hi,
Just a precision because, beyond translating, I manage a French help
network too. Can you tell me, and I think it could be precised in the
book or on the website, what kind of buildings can do a user exactly
with this stable (6.6)? From 64 to 64 bits? From 32 to 32? Or 32 to 64?
If I read arch
Thanks to Matt's hard work, it looks like the -dev version of the book
now has over half the packages updated from the current stable release.
There only a couple of minor tickets outstanding. We are at
Linux-2.6.32 which has been designated for long term support.
I am proposing that we make a