Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I don't see it in Greg's DIY site, but it may be in a patch. I didn't
> look at those.
See the thread starting at
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-August/052536.html
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.lin
Chris Staub wrote:
> On 12/04/2009 08:29 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> 2009/12/5 Bruce Dubbs:
>>>
>>> A *bootstrap* build on x86_64 doesn't use that option, but we
>>> are passing it anyway (so, presumably, our second set of
>>> compilers are built differently from a bootstrap (
On 12/04/2009 08:29 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> 2009/12/5 Bruce Dubbs:
>>
>> A *bootstrap* build on x86_64 doesn't use that option, but we
>> are passing it anyway (so, presumably, our second set of
>> compilers are built differently from a bootstrap (and from our
>> final set o
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/12/5 Bruce Dubbs :
>
>>> In 6.15 the sed is correctly wrapped in a case statement, but
>>> the text just says
As in Section 5.10, “GCC-4.4.2 - Pass 2”, apply the following
sed to force the build to use the -fomit-frame-pointer
compiler flag in order to ensur
2009/12/5 Bruce Dubbs :
>>
>> In 6.15 the sed is correctly wrapped in a case statement, but
>> the text just says
>>> As in Section 5.10, “GCC-4.4.2 - Pass 2”, apply the following
>>> sed to force the build to use the -fomit-frame-pointer
>>> compiler flag in order to ensure consistent compiler bu
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I still haven't built a recent LFS system, but I'm about to
> restart (x86_64), and I'm checking my scripts match the
> current development book, and working out what the
> presence of the {,/usr}/lib64 symlinks from 6.5 will do to my
> BLFS scripts (for the moment, I'm not sure
I still haven't built a recent LFS system, but I'm about to
restart (x86_64), and I'm checking my scripts match the
current development book, and working out what the
presence of the {,/usr}/lib64 symlinks from 6.5 will do to my
BLFS scripts (for the moment, I'm not sure if I like these
symlinks bu
