Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
So, actually, .so and .a files are really only needed at compile time for
other packages. :-)
>>> OK, I was throwing the .so and the .so.1 files together. Since they are
>>> generally only symlinks, it makes sense to keep them together.
>> Ex
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>> So, actually, .so and .a files are really only needed at compile time for
>>> other packages. :-)
>> OK, I was throwing the .so and the .so.1 files together. Since they are
>> generally only symlinks, it makes sense to keep them together.
>
> Except I'm not sure it does
ga ho wrote:
>>> 55-lfs.rules:SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", MODE="0644", ACTION=="add",
>>> RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start"
>>>
>>> ???-- Bruce
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks, I'll double check /dev/rtc and the 55-lfs.rules on my
>> system.
>
> The rule in my 55-lfs.rules file is exactly as stated above howeve
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>>
But we don't put *any* .so (or .a) files into /lib, because the only
reason for /lib is to hold libraries that are required before /usr may
be mounted (i.e. early bootscripts). And when you
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>
>>> But we don't put *any* .so (or .a) files into /lib, because the only
>>> reason for /lib is to hold libraries that are required before /usr may
>>> be mounted (i.e. early bootscripts). And when you're compiling -- which
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>
>>> But we don't put *any* .so (or .a) files into /lib, because the only
>>> reason for /lib is to hold libraries that are required before /usr may
>>> be mounted (i.e. early bootscr
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>> But we don't put *any* .so (or .a) files into /lib, because the only
>> reason for /lib is to hold libraries that are required before /usr may
>> be mounted (i.e. early bootscripts). And when you're compiling -- which
>> is the only time .so or .a fi
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:29 -0500
> > From: Bruce Dubbs
> > Subject: Re: Problems with setclock in?
> > lfs-bootscripts-20090812 LFS
> > ??? 6.5
> > To: LFS Developers Mailinglist
> > Message-ID: <4aaad1dd.9050...@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> But we don't put *any* .so (or .a) files into /lib, because the only
> reason for /lib is to hold libraries that are required before /usr may
> be mounted (i.e. early bootscripts). And when you're compiling -- which
> is the only time .so or .a files are used -- /usr had be
