It's looking good.
I downloaded ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-1.97~beta2.tar.gz on a 64-bit
version of LFS-6.5.
I used
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --disable-largefile \
--disable-grub-emu --disable-grub-emu-usb --disable-grub-fstest
make
sudo make install
The disab
Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Ismael Luceno wrote:
> No, sorry. I don't see any posts from you since 2007.
Yep, I used to use LFS, but went to debian because I had no time to
maintain my system. Now I got a new job, less hours and more
comfortable, so it lets me to dedicate more time to this stuff :).
Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs escribió:
>> Reference: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2093
>>
>> I noticed that a new beta version of grub2 was released last week.
>>
>> http://grub.enbug.org/
>>
>> 2. configure errors out if you don't have ruby installed. It is only used
>> in
Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> Reference: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2093
>
> I noticed that a new beta version of grub2 was released last week.
>
> http://grub.enbug.org/
>
> 2. configure errors out if you don't have ruby installed. It is only used
> in
> configure to generate th
ga ho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there is a missing symbolic link for setclock in the Makefile of
> lfs-bootscripts-20090812 as having built LFS 6.5 I noticed the time was
> always out by an hour for example showing 22:00 BST when in fact it was 9pm
> in the UK.
>
> In the lfs-bootscripts-20090812
Hi,
I think there is a missing symbolic link for setclock in the Makefile of
lfs-bootscripts-20090812 as having built LFS 6.5 I noticed the time was always
out by an hour for example showing 22:00 BST when in fact it was 9pm in the UK.
In the lfs-bootscripts-20090812 Makefile there is the symbo
Reference: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2093
I noticed that a new beta version of grub2 was released last week.
http://grub.enbug.org/
I downloaded and built grub-1.97~beta2.tar.gz. Here are couple of comments.
1. The filename is weird. I don't know why they insist on being d
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:33:34 +0200, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> Correction, after some additional tests it does seem that ABI=32 in the
> CFLAGS causes it to not find a working compiler. It didn't pick up the
> CFLAGS values on the first test for some reason. My previous email
> provides the solution
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:15:28 +0200, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> Your problem here is not the ABI variable, your problem is the fact that
> it can't find a working copy of GCC. Why this is I can't tell you,
> you'll have to check your PATH and backtrace your steps. See the
> attached log, on a 64-bit s
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote:
> > checking compiler gcc -pipe -O2 -march=athlon64-sse3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > ABI=32 -pipe -O2 -march=athlon64-sse3 -fomit-frame-pointer... no
> > checking compiler icc -pipe -O2 -march=athlon64-sse3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > ABI=32
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:58:51PM +0200, Philipp Christian Loewner wrote:
> root:/sources/gmp-4.3.1# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --enable-mpbsd
> checking build system type... athlon64-pc-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... athlon64-pc-linux-gnu
> checking for a BSD-compatible inst
> Of course. The instruction is wrong. Try
>
>export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS ABI=32"
>
> just like the instruction says.
>
I wouldn't bug the list if I hadn't already tried that. Please take
a look at the following log:
root:/sources/gmp-4.3.1# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --enable-mpb
12 matches
Mail list logo
