On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:31:27PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Just 500 when less than 20 will do. You will be much more likely to get help
> if
> you show that you have done some analysis on your own.
>
> BTW, this should be sent to lfs-support.
>
>-- Bruce
Apologies, I thought lfs-dev w
Chris R. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Chris R. Jones wrote:
>>
>> Why did you feel compelled to dump an entire log instead of just the
>> relevant part?
>
> Because the parts that are irrelevent to some are of importance to others.
> The full log
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Chris R. Jones wrote:
>
> Why did you feel compelled to dump an entire log instead of just the relevant
> part?
Because the parts that are irrelevent to some are of importance to others.
The full log was just 500 lines.
>
> > Is th
Chris R. Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to use the latest book (LFS-BOOK-SVN-20090718.pdf).
> I get to chapter 6.20 without any problems, and then when doing "make check"
> on e2fsprogs-1.41.8, I see 4 test failures. I'm building on x86_64.
>
> The tests appear to be getting segmentation faults.
Why
Hi,
I'm trying to use the latest book (LFS-BOOK-SVN-20090718.pdf).
I get to chapter 6.20 without any problems, and then when doing "make check"
on e2fsprogs-1.41.8, I see 4 test failures. I'm building on x86_64.
The tests appear to be getting segmentation faults.
Is this a known problem? Any w
Tobias Gasser wrote:
> just a short question where i could not find the answer in the changelog:
>
> when did you move inetutils from after gzip to after libtools??
r8836, 03/12/09 15:02
You can find this yourself by browsing the source xml and looking at the
revision log.
http://wiki.linuxfro
just a short question where i could not find the answer in the changelog:
when did you move inetutils from after gzip to after libtools??
thanks
tobias
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Before you release 6.5, look at this: the Vim patch is out of date.
The patch level is now 234, and we gotta do somethin' to update it!!!
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Oh yea, an update that I just got today from Colin, saying that Groff
1.20.1 has been intregrated into Debian Sid, and that the debian patch
is now reduced in size.
I thank myself for getting Groff 1.20.1 into Debian Unstable, because
of that email relay. (He diddn't know about Groff 1.20.1 before
