Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> There is a problem, however. The script uses open() but with 3
>> arguments instead of 2. From what I've found so far, this change in
>> syntax was introduced in perl-5.8.0, so the installation of Linux
>> Headers fails if the host's version of
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> There is a problem, however. The script uses open() but with 3 arguments
> instead of 2. From what I've found so far, this change in syntax was
> introduced in perl-5.8.0, so the installation of Linux Headers fails if
> the host's version of perl is < 5.8.0. I'm investig
Just FYI:
Seems that the headers_install (and therefore headers_check) command in
the kernel source is a now a Perl script. This appears to be new in 2.6.27.x
See here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/8/29
There is a problem, however. The script uses open() but with 3 arguments
instead of 2. From
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The real issue is that the --bind mount of /dev is unmounted as are
> /proc and /sys. (BTW, this issue would also affect any attempt to use
> the grub installed in chroot, since that needs the devices corresponding
> to
On Thursday October 16 2008 03:35:39 am Jan Dvorak wrote:
> > I added patches yesterday and today to make Bash use /dev/urandom for
> > $RANDOM,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ RANDOM=1
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $RANDOM
> 16838
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $RANDOM
> 5758
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ RANDOM=2
>
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:30:46 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't believe it's about simply minimalism, but it's about keeping to
>> the point. If it is really beneficial to many users in various
>> circumstances to have such a command in the book
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:30:46 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe it's about simply minimalism, but it's about keeping to
> the point. If it is really beneficial to many users in various
> circumstances to have such a command in the book, great, add it. But if
> it's
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, TheOldFellow wrote:
> However, I do not believe that there is much value in it as a
> bootstrap, when, as Alexander says, there is knoppix (and a plethora of
> other LiveCD distros) and maintenance resources are scarce.
Well, I really do believe there is value in a (minimal,
Hi all,
I must first say tha I am blind. And terefor I greately
appreciate the lfs livecd since its simplicity make it very
easily customizable. Indeed it is not difficult to take the
existing livecd and add accessibility tools to it like brltty
or a speech synthesis. I know that in the community
