Re: Confused about some E2fsprogs notes

2008-10-08 Thread Steve Crosby
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 05 October 2008 16:43:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > sudo /sbin/debugfs -R feature /dev/sda3 >> > debugfs 1.41.1 (01-Sep-2008) >> > Filesystem features: has_journal filetype needs_recovery >>

Re: Confused about some E2fsprogs notes

2008-10-08 Thread Trent Shea
On Sunday 05 October 2008 16:43:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/build > sudo /sbin/debugfs -R feature /dev/sda3 > > debugfs 1.41.1 (01-Sep-2008) > > Filesystem features: has_journal filetype needs_recovery > > sparse_super large_file > > > > it shows only a subset of the features the

Re: Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> >>> Randy, when you updated GCC, did you consider tickets 2114 and 2056? >>> >> See the remarks I made to that ticket. I didn't build with >> the switch, so I can't comment. I really don't want to be >> responsible for that

Re: Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > >> Randy, when you updated GCC, did you consider tickets 2114 and 2056? >> > > See the remarks I made to that ticket. I didn't build with > the switch, so I can't comment. I really don't want to be > responsible for that one. > > As far as 2114

Re: Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Sorry about not getting these final few package updates in > the book. Real Life got in the way a little bit. I should > have it all done by this evening, however. Alas, today has simply been a day where I could not contribute. Tomorrow will be better and we'll have this d

Re: Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Randy, when you updated GCC, did you consider tickets 2114 and 2056? See the remarks I made to that ticket. I didn't build with the switch, so I can't comment. I really don't want to be responsible for that one. As far as 2114 goes, I didn't see (the issues) what the ticket

Re: Tickets

2008-10-08 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:42:46PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > In reviewing the current tickets, there are two (#2160 and #2189) that > concern > bootscripts. Do we have a volunteer to address these. > > Also, there are three tickets related to locales and test suites (#2159, > 2171, > and 21

udev-130

2008-10-08 Thread William Immendorf
Udev is now at 130: Here are some of the changes from 124 to 130: In udev-124: * cdrom_id now properly recognizes blank media. In udev-125: * Bugfixes. * Default udev rules are should now be put into /lib/udev/rules.d/ now, to make it clear that they should not be edited by a user. User-made

Re: Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry about not getting these final few package updates in > the book. Real Life got in the way a little bit. I should > have it all done by this evening, however. Randy, when you updated GCC, did you consider tickets 2114 and 2056? With the glibc update did y

Tickets

2008-10-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
In reviewing the current tickets, there are two (#2160 and #2189) that concern bootscripts. Do we have a volunteer to address these. Also, there are three tickets related to locales and test suites (#2159, 2171, and 2172). These should be considered together. Volunteers? -- Bruce -- http

Final Updates

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, Sorry about not getting these final few package updates in the book. Real Life got in the way a little bit. I should have it all done by this evening, however. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the

Re: New personal experimental book

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote: > I actually > was able to patch the file.c source and things work again. If anyone is interested in looking at or testing the patch, here it is (it's also in the repo): Submitted By:Randy McMurchy Date:2008-10-08 Initial Package Version: 4.2

Re: New personal experimental book

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote: > I reverted to 4.23. I never got a chance to see if 4.26 worked. In > 4.25, the -e (exclude) switch is broken, both long an short options do > not work. Yes, I've confirmed that. However, only *parts* of the -e switch are broken. And I see in the code why. I actually was able

Re: New personal experimental book

2008-10-08 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > > >> Roll back to file-4.21. The newer versions of file do not display the >> character set if type is text/troff >> >> Well, that is a separate issue. File is still broken (either 4.21 with >> illogical guessing at the charac

Re: New personal experimental book

2008-10-08 Thread Randy McMurchy
DJ Lucas wrote: > Roll back to file-4.21. The newer versions of file do not display the > character set if type is text/troff > > Well, that is a separate issue. File is still broken (either 4.21 with > illogical guessing at the character encoding of text files, or 4.25 with > non-work