Re: GCC-4.3.1, Linux-2.6.26.2

2008-09-02 Thread Greg Schafer
Robert Connolly wrote: > I'm curious if any of you have tried the Binutils test suite with gcc43. I > get > failures from binutils-2.18, and more failures from binutils-2.18.50.0.9. Saw these failures back in Feb'. Binutils CVS HEAD checkout from around that time resolved the failures. But I ne

Re: About the future format for LFS (reworded)

2008-09-02 Thread Bruce Dubbs
William Immendorf wrote: > This started in a March 2008 post titled "Format for the future of LFS". It > has been disscused through the years and I decided to start it back up again. William, I appreciate you starting up the conversation. Progress has be quite slow and we need to put some more

Re: About the future format for LFS (reworded)

2008-09-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:25:52PM -0400, William Immendorf wrote: > > >Huh ? AFAIK I sent a standard reply to this list, in the same way > >as my mail to which you have just replied. > >http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2008-August/061569.html > > I use web based mail, and I can't d

Re: About the future format for LFS (reworded)

2008-09-02 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:39:54AM +0400, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > On Tuesday 02 September 2008 00:48:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > > > 1. - the original title, in Russian of "What Is To Be Done ?" by > > Lenin - at least according to wikipedia - I've dropped the question > > mark because you aren't aski

Re: About the future format for LFS (reworded)

2008-09-02 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 00:48:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > 1. - the original title, in Russian of "What Is To Be Done ?" by > Lenin - at least according to wikipedia - I've dropped the question > mark because you aren't asking, you are proclaiming. JFYI, the author of "What Is To Be Done?" (1862--