Randy McMurchy wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote:
>> We need to change some of the elements and replace them with new elements
>
> No disrespected intended, but who is this guy? Has he
> ever contributed to the book? Is this Gerard's nephew
> or something. I'm really confused. This doesn't sound
>
Hey all,
I'll be out of town for the next week and a bit on holidays down south (read:
USA). I'll check when I can to make sure the server behaves but I won't be able
to do so continuously.
For those of you who have my cell phone number; please don't hesitate to call
if problems arise. If you
William Immendorf wrote:
> We need to change some of the elements and replace them with new elements
No disrespected intended, but who is this guy? Has he
ever contributed to the book? Is this Gerard's nephew
or something. I'm really confused. This doesn't sound
like anything I've ever read on thi
We need to change some of the elements and replace them with new elements, such
as the screen and userinput combo. We also need to change decreapted Docbook 4
elements, such as ulink and bookinfo to link and info, respcrety. Also, we can
remove elements we don't need.
We need to change the he
I hope I'll find scripts to automate such changes since they modify all the
files containing the text of the book itself. For stylesheets no problem for me.
If I'm helped it could be a no too hard work. Interesting to follow.
Sincerely, JP
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d
We will proably need to change some decrepated elements, like ulink and
bookinfo, and for the entries, we can use this:
%general-entities;
%allent;
]>
No change to the .ent files is needed, but we need to change the xsl
stylesheets.
__
ok it it's only few changes and no need to change all the book's code or
structur cool. Because since I translate it, upgrading information is easy, but
upgrading and changes all the xml code... updating from 6.1 to 6.3 was hard, so
that's why I'm worry for this new evolution. But if I understan
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hmmm. To obtain this new format, is it necessary to "code" (write all the
> tags) again all the book? Or is there a tool to do the conversion
> automatically?
It *should* only require minimal changes. The header:
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.d
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 04:27:41PM -0400, William Immendorf wrote:
>
> Here's my plan for the future of the LFS format:
>
> 1. Use Relax NG instead of DTDs. It offers more customatibility than DTDs.
> And if you're sick of XML, you can use RNCs. (Relax NG Compact Syntax) You
> can also put elem
Hmmm. To obtain this new format, is it necessary to "code" (write all the tags)
again all the book? Or is there a tool to do the conversion automatically?
Thanks for the answer.
Sincerely, JP
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsu
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>See:
>http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/855
>It's been around for 4 years, but we've never really addressed it.
I've seen it, that will fix the ticket and make LFS more flexible.
_
See what people are sa
William Immendorf wrote:
> Here's my plan for the future of the LFS format:
>
> 1. Use Relax NG instead of DTDs. It offers more customatibility than DTDs.
> And if you're sick of XML, you can use RNCs. (Relax NG Compact Syntax) You
> can also put elements from Docbook 5.0 in and take out ones you
Here's my plan for the future of the LFS format:
1. Use Relax NG instead of DTDs. It offers more customatibility than DTDs. And
if you're sick of XML, you can use RNCs. (Relax NG Compact Syntax) You can also
put elements from Docbook 5.0 in and take out ones you don't want. Also, you
can creat
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:51:09 -0700
"Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a progress report. Nothing much to say though, it seems solid as
> > a rock. I've been running Apache/PHP/MySQL/Joomla on it all week
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a progress report. Nothing much to say though, it seems solid as
> a rock. I've been running Apache/PHP/MySQL/Joomla on it all week -
> zero-issues.
>
> Today I built Xorg7-almost7.4 using the very latest stuff that
Hi,
This is the initial announcement for the initd-tools project. It aims
to implement the install_initd and remove_initd programs described in
the LSB 3.2:
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initsrcinstrm.html
The implementation aims for a SysV init
Just a progress report. Nothing much to say though, it seems solid as
a rock. I've been running Apache/PHP/MySQL/Joomla on it all week -
zero-issues.
Today I built Xorg7-almost7.4 using the very latest stuff that seems to
work OK, including Mesa-7.1 and Xorg-Server-1.4.00.906, everything
compile
Dear List,
I've been using gcc-4.3.1 for the 20080711
version of LFS, but with almost all packages as recent
as I can get. I'm even living with groff-1.19.2, though
I may downgrade to groff-1.18 so I can use the patch.
The most important exceptions so far are that I'm only
using gr
18 matches
Mail list logo
