Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Ken Moffat wrote: > My most recent ppc build (clfs, book dated 20080212) with > glibc-2.7 had the following fail (1.4GHz G4): > > math/test-ldouble.out > math/test-ildoubl.out > crypt/sha512c-test.out > elf/check-localplt.out Woops, posted the other message before I saw this one. Thanks for the

Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Randy McMurchy wrote: > So, bottom line for me is I don't see any errors other than the > math/test-double error in a 32bit multilib build. Both the 64bit > multilib and regular LFS (not JH branch) don't get any errors. Not really the bottom line (yet). Dennis is working on a PowerPC arch. Or, at

Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:53:27PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> > Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST: >> >> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the >> situation >> >> is acceptable or not. >> > >> > I cannot answer that either. You've received mor

Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:53:27PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST: > >> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation > >> is acceptable or not. > > > > I cannot answer that either. You've received more errors th

Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST: >> I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation >> is acceptable or not. > > I cannot answer that either. You've received more errors than I > have while building in several different environments. darn :-( I

Re: SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dennis Clarke wrote these words on 04/18/08 13:11 CST: > I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation > is acceptable or not. I cannot answer that either. You've received more errors than I have while building in several different environments. > Should I be worried

SVN-JH-20080403 : 6.9. Glibc-2.7 - more than a few errors

2008-04-18 Thread Dennis Clarke
I have taken a run at this twice and am not entirely sure if the situation is acceptable or not. I build glibc as detailed and then run "make -k check " with output being dumped via tee into glibc-check-log. The make -k check ends with these lines : make[1]: Target `check' not remade because o