Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> ttyNN 620 666 <- diff
>
> These are various different virtual consoles (although tty0 is the same
> as console: the current VC). I'd say we probably have the permissions
> too wide: allowing all users to read from arbitrary other consoles is
> not a good idea. I'd s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> A sysadmin could always override what we have by adding custom
> rules before 50 for desired changes.
If the sysadmin uses :=, that's true. Otherwise their changes get
overridden by the 50- file.
> Perhaps we should create
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> First, we could simply remove the
> last_rule options, e.g. with the following sed:
>
> sed -i 's/, OPTIONS="last_rule"//' 50-udev-default.rules
>
> since nothing that has this option set should have it.
That's one way. Another would be to write the appropriate seds to
c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I've gotten a bit of time this weekend to look at what it would take to
upgrade udev in the development book. I've looked through 25-lfs.rules
and tried to remove as many rules as possible (all the rules that were
duplicated in udev's new 50-udev
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 10/12/07, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:30:11AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>>> What does that have to do with sparc64? You're the only person I know
>>> that has one, so that means development and support is 100% you
