--with-arch=i486 (was Re: Merging the jh branch to trunk)

2007-09-05 Thread Greg Schafer
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 04:54:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> There also needs to be more explanation in the text interspersed with >> the instructions. For instance in "5.4. GCC-4.2.1 - Pass 1" we have: >> >> "Also, the --with-arch flag is only necessary for x86 machi

Re: [PATCH] Add screen install attributes for final system packages

2007-09-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 5 de Septiembre de 2007 20:41, Matthew Burgess escribió: > No comments or complaints here. We might hit merge problems between this > and the jh-branch merge, but they'll be pretty trivial to fix up, I should > think. I will look to merge the changes into the jh-branch also. We nee

Re: [PATCH] Add screen install attributes for final system packages

2007-09-05 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 07:52:41PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote: > If there is no objetions about that additions, I will commit the changes this > weekend. +1 > Comments, complaints? Currently, my biggest complaint is that I have no ice cream. :( -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list

Re: [PATCH] Add screen install attributes for final system packages

2007-09-05 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:52:41 +0200, "M.Canales.es" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059682.html > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059687.html > > If there is no objetions about that additions, I will commit the changes > t

Re: [PATCH] Add screen install attributes for final system packages

2007-09-05 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 21 de Julio de 2007 01:42, Dan Nicholson escribió: > Another jhalfs helper. As has been discussed before, it would be nice to > mark the screen sections with an attribute to announce that it will be > installing to the system rather than just working in the source/build > tree. Manuel su

Re: Merging the jh branch to trunk

2007-09-05 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:02:40 + (UTC), Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes: >> Does this sound sane to everyone? If so, I'll endeavour to complete the > patch > series as soon as possible and >> post it here for review. > > How's this comi

Re: Merging the jh branch to trunk

2007-09-05 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Matthew Burgess linuxfromscratch.org> writes: > Does this sound sane to everyone? If so, I'll endeavour to complete the patch series as soon as possible and > post it here for review. How's this coming? Need any help? -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http:/

Re: Xen-LFS hint

2007-09-05 Thread Luca
- Original Message - From: "Bryan Kadzban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1:05 PM Subject: Re: Xen-LFS hint > I'm going to guess that that's because your Gmail account is not the > one > that you've subscribed to the list you're

Re: Xen-LFS hint

2007-09-05 Thread Bryan Kadzban
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 FYI: Luca wrote: > P.S. Posts sent via my Gmail account are classified and rejected as > spam I'm going to guess that that's because your Gmail account is not the one that you've subscribed to the list you're trying to post to. I've been hit wi

Xen-LFS hint

2007-09-05 Thread Luca
Hello. Sorry to say it'll take me more time than estimated. I've got to publish a paper and waiting new hardware delivery (to be used to test and write the hint). Regards, Luca P.S. Posts sent via my Gmail account are classified and rejected as spam -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi