Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Right now in both 6.3-rc1 and 6.3 branch that URL are hardcoded in
>>> packages.ent to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/,
>>> that is no
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, that sounds fine. Let me know when you think -rc2 should be released.
Just wanted to mention there is a 6.3-rc1 package tarball I generated a
couple days ago, will do one for rc2 as soon as it is out as well.
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/lfs-packages-6.3
On 7/31/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Right now in both 6.3-rc1 and 6.3 branch that URL are hardcoded in
> > packages.ent to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/,
> > that is not kosher.
>
> Possibly, b
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For reference this is what installed with libedit.
>>
>> root:root 755 160628 /usr/lib/libedit.so.0.0.24
>> root:root 755 809 /usr/lib/libedit.la
>> root:root 644 181584 /usr/lib
Original Message
Subject: List messages rejected
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. Sorry to trouble you. My messages to the list are being held and
rejected. The last one, my own copy below, was held
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/30/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I put out a 6.3-rc1 a week ago and there really has been very little
>>> feedback. Is it ready for final release?
>> Let me spin new tarballs for lfs-bootscripts an
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:50:53PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tar is repeatedly failing '26: incremental' for me, looks like a
> > regression. But nobody else has commented.
>
> If you have any idea how to narrow this down, that'd be g
On 7/30/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tar is repeatedly failing '26: incremental' for me, looks like a
> regression. But nobody else has commented.
If you have any idea how to narrow this down, that'd be great. I have
hit this before myself, and it seems like a race condition, bu
On 7/30/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I put out a 6.3-rc1 a week ago and there really has been very little
> > feedback. Is it ready for final release?
>
> Let me spin new tarballs for lfs-bootscripts and udev-config. I'll
> m
On 7/31/07, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > I would like to allow glibc-2.5.1 through a freeze if it happens. That
> > should be safe since we've been moving the snapshot along.
>
> New Glibc's are now up.
Thanks, Greg. Was there no announcement?
--
Dan
--
ht
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I would like to allow glibc-2.5.1 through a freeze if it happens. That
> should be safe since we've been moving the snapshot along.
New Glibc's are now up.
Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.
On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Martes, 31 de Julio de 2007 16:07, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> >
> > http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
>
> I think that the book URLs to download both lfs-bootscripts and udev-config
El Martes, 31 de Julio de 2007 16:07, Dan Nicholson escribió:
>
> http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
>
I think that the book URLs to download both lfs-bootscripts and udev-config
should be changed to use http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org. It'
On 7/31/07, Jens Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as far as I can tell, everything boots flawlessly; there is one thing
> I did leave out because of local "deviation from the book": we took
> care to have our loglevel set here before that got into the
> lfs-bootscripts package, so I didn't c
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 02:48:03PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I rolled a new snapshot that has a few changes since the last 20070420
> tarball. Please test it out so we can get any fixes in to 6.3. They
> should be entirely backwards compatible with existing scripts.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12
ent kernel. Bryan also added rules for DVBs and
extra floppy types. Please test this out as I've merged it into the
6.3 branch.
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
Changes since the last snapshot (beware gmail formatting):
2007-07-31 Dan Nicholson &l
On 7/26/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:17:52 -0700, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On 7/26/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> The 2.6.22 kernel (maybe 2.6.21
- Forwarded message from Dale Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Dale Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: extra prompt.sh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:15:40 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You know, when I got this version of LFS up for the first time, I
thought
Jens Stroebel wrote:
> I maybe should know where to look, but I don't...
> Where is the download location for the new LFS-bootscripts you rolled?
>
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-bootscripts-20070730.tar.bz2
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I rolled a new snapshot that has a few changes since the last 20070420
> tarball. Please test it out so we can get any fixes in to 6.3. They
> should be entirely backwards compatible with existing scripts.
Hiya.
I maybe should know where to look, but I don't
20 matches
Mail list logo
