On 3/16/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Jonathan Oksman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The same semantics caused a simular bug with umask. My user
> > (jonathan, group jonathan) got the default umask of 002 because of his
> > uid being equal to gid. After compiling gp
On 3/16/07, Jonathan Oksman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I'm installing packages, I tend to use su constantly so that I
> can switch in and out of root access to the filesystem. I'm sure lots
> of you do this. Others among you, notably the jhalfs developers,
> might make more use of sudo.
On 3/16/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/16/07 09:27 CST:
> >
> > > It just needs some LFS boilerplate at the top. That's everything
> > > upstream + LC_ALL=C in the mkbuiltins script that
On 3/16/07, Jonathan Oksman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just did a quick reference between BLFS 6.1 and 6.2, and I gather
> that would be the dhcp-3.0.5-client_dns-1.patch that you added?
Yeah. That's a patch from the upstream alpha release, so it should
work well. It's been working on my sys
Hello BLFS Development!
It's been a while since my first post here, so I figured I would add
some of my observations since 6.2 has been released. I'll only be
discussing the section "The Bash Shell Startup Files" today, since it
is still fresh in my mind from my most recent build.
First, a quick
On 3/16/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 03/16/07 09:27 CST:
>
> > It just needs some LFS boilerplate at the top. That's everything
> > upstream + LC_ALL=C in the mkbuiltins script that I sent him and he
> > said he would apply.
>
> How many patches
Hi
Creating the regular expression in a variable, and then using this
variable without quoting it in the conditional construct works, so we
modified our bash'based package manager to act like this.
I agree it's not cool to have a change in bash scripts parsing. Maybe
an option or a specific BASH_
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
[..snip...]
> > Following up my own post, sorry, but I thought the above incomplete after
> > a bit more testing:
> >
> > It seems like it's OK to "" the left side of the comparison,
> > but not the regex which should
