Re: Binutils testsuite

2006-10-24 Thread Greg Schafer
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:03:16AM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > if the user includes "-Os" in his CFLAGS, binutils tests in LFS-6.2 will > show 21 failures ("visibility" and "shared" tests). 18 of them don't > show up if the "binutils-2.17-ppc64_fix_testsuite-1.patch" testsuite fix ..

Binutils testsuite

2006-10-24 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello, if the user includes "-Os" in his CFLAGS, binutils tests in LFS-6.2 will show 21 failures ("visibility" and "shared" tests). 18 of them don't show up if the "binutils-2.17-ppc64_fix_testsuite-1.patch" testsuite fix from CLFS is applied. The rationale of that patch is explained in http:

Re: BLFS 6.2

2006-10-24 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Editors please review the tickets you've assigned yourself and determine > if you'll be able to do them and/or they still need to be done for the > 6.2 release. According to the list below, I'm currently testing (a week later than planned) Linux-PAM, PHP, BIND, and Apac

Re: BLFS 6.2

2006-10-24 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy wrote: > > 1. Change all the references of BLFS-6.2 to BLFS-6.2.0 and >go forward. > +1 -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev F

Note in the packages page about the kernel.

2006-10-24 Thread Ag. Hatzimanikas
The following note is absolute. The Linux kernel is updated relatively often, many times due to discoveries of security vulnerabilities. The latest available 2.6.17.x kernel version should be used, unless the errata page says otherwise. Do not use version 2.6.18 or later kernels due to potential