On Fri, Sep 01, at 09:56 Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Shouldn't this discussion be taking place on the -dev list? (my
> apologies if it has been already, and I overlooked/forgot about the
> discussion).
>
> Seems if you wanted community input, the -dev list would probably
> provide higher traffic, a
I wrote:
no implementaion of Man conforms with FLS and thus LSB
I meant FHS instead of FLS. Sorry for the typo.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
LFS Trac wrote these words on 09/01/06 04:26 CST:
> #1869: locatedb should be in /var/lib/misc not /var/lib/locate for FHS
> compliance
> +---
> +---
> Co
Peter Ennis wrote:
It would add more value to the project if the build
passed the implementation tests. I may look at this
in my "spare time" :)
It would also add value to the LSB project if their sample
implementation actually conformed (no implementaion of Man conforms with
FLS and thus LS
