Re: some nit-picky stuff

2006-08-22 Thread Allard Welter
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 01:16, Dan Nicholson wrote: [...] > Hopefully it will make the everything a lot clearer. Thanks Dan. Many links for many rainy days. Praise be to the everything. Allard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/bl

Re: some nit-picky stuff

2006-08-22 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/22/06, Allard Welter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:35, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/21/06, Allard Welter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't > > include symbols. Try browsing maths page in wiki for instance

Re: some nit-picky stuff

2006-08-22 Thread Allard Welter
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 20:35, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 8/21/06, Allard Welter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Need more than just the two TTF in /usr/share/font as these don't > > include symbols. Try browsing maths page in wiki for instance. > > Allard, could you point me to the specific page?

Re: xLFS Book Licenses

2006-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Currently, LFS ticket 1765, >> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1765, suggests that LFS use >> the licenses that are currently in the BLFS book. Jim, Ryan, and I have >> had some off-line conversations about this and feel it is time to open

Re: xLFS Book Licenses

2006-08-22 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/21/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently, LFS, HLFS, and Cross-LFS have the same license. This license is "home grown" and has not been vetted by anyone knowledgeable in the law. BLFS went to a dual license format some time ago using a Creative Commons License, http://www.l

Re: xLFS Book Licenses

2006-08-22 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Currently, LFS ticket 1765, http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1765, suggests that LFS use the licenses that are currently in the BLFS book. Jim, Ryan, and I have had some off-line conversations about this and feel it is time to open up this discussion to the communit

Re: xLFS Book Licenses

2006-08-22 Thread M.Canales.es
El Martes, 22 de Agosto de 2006 06:13, Bruce Dubbs escribió: > He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License, > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at > it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and > protecting the books. If it

Re: xLFS Book Licenses

2006-08-22 Thread Joe Ciccone
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > He and Ryan are proposing the Open Publication License, > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub, for all the books. I've looked at > it and it seems to meet the standards of having a recognized license and > protecting the books. If it is the community's decision, I have no > pr

Re: Dead Project? (I hope not)

2006-08-22 Thread dperkins
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Richard Downing wrote: >> So I think the project needs a challenge. Trouble is I can't think what >> it is! > > HLFS? > > Alex :-) > > -- Now that sounds interesting! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscr

Re: Dead Project? (I hope not)

2006-08-22 Thread Alex Merry
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:17PM +0100, Richard Downing wrote: > So I think the project needs a challenge. Trouble is I can't think what > it is! HLFS? Alex :-) -- Pippin Computer Monkey to the Pelican www.oxrev.org.uk, www.corpusjcr.org, www.rev.org.uk pgpWLzymYuM1G.pgp Description: PGP s