On 8/18/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noted that there is some minor trivial updates to CLFS recently, the
occasional package updates to LFS, and updates to jalfs (which is only
as good as the [x]LFS books), there really is no development going
on at all any more within the LFS p
Randy,
CLFS is on a stabilization cycle right now. The entire CLFS team is
going through the book with a fine tooth comb to get a release out very
soon. Except to see RC4 in the next few days, then in a week or so of no
changes the final release of 1.0.0.
I can't speak for the other pro
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Noted that there is some minor trivial updates to CLFS recently, the
> occasional package updates to LFS, and updates to jalfs (which is only
> as good as the [x]LFS books), there really is no development going
> on at all any more within the LFS project.
>
CL
Hi all,
Noted that there is some minor trivial updates to CLFS recently, the
occasional package updates to LFS, and updates to jalfs (which is only
as good as the [x]LFS books), there really is no development going
on at all any more within the LFS project.
Discussion (you know, where people inte
I have just been informed that the ISP hosting anduin will move the
server location and the system will be down September 3rd, 2006, 2:00am
and 6:00am CDT.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Alex Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:06:58PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> > >
>> > For now, I'd let Alex forward the patch to linux-hotplug-devel,
>> together
>> > with the description of the documentation issue.
>>
>> Will
