Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/17/06, Alex Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:06:58PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > > For now, I'd let Alex forward the patch to linux-hotplug-devel, together > with the description of the documentation issue. Will do. That was fast. http://kernel.org/

Re: Devfs history update

2006-08-17 Thread Matthew Burgess
Peter Ennis wrote: and finally removed. Thanks, Peter. See r7774. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Devfs history update

2006-08-17 Thread Peter Ennis
LFS 6.2 7.4. Device and Module Handling on an LFS System 7.4.1. History ... It has also been marked as deprecated due to a lack of recent maintenance. ... and finally removed. Ref: http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/06/29/#2006_06_29 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.commits.head/828

Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/17/06, Alex Merry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:06:58PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > > For now, I'd let Alex forward the patch to linux-hotplug-devel, together > with the description of the documentation issue. Will do. Excellent. Thanks for looking into

Re: linux-2.6.17 and openat

2006-08-17 Thread Joe Ciccone
Testing this patch right now but, I'm fairly certain that it's going to work. If you want the short and sweet version see the attached patch, else read on. Looking at "sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/openat.c" on line 31 I see. #if !defined OPENAT && !defined __ASSUME_ATFCTS # define OPENAT openat This

Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Alex Merry
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:06:58PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >Alex Merry wrote: > >>On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:58:54PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > >>This patch should fix it. > >> > > > >I think this is a case where we should wait for upstream to fix the > >pr

Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Alex Merry wrote: On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:58:54PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: Right. I get the same thing here. What I meant was, I think it's a bug in udevtest. The same comment "/* remove sysfs_path if given */" is used in both udevtest and udevinfo. However, it

Small typo in hardened-specs.h

2006-08-17 Thread Filip Bartmann
I try to compile current unstable HLFS, and I find small typo in file hardened-specs.h, in chapter 5.9.1 in HLFS book: - #define CC1_SPEC "%(cc1_cpu) %{profile:-p} \ %{static|D__KERNEL__|fpic|fPIC|fpie|fPIE|fno-pic|fno-PIC

Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alex Merry wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:58:54PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> Right. I get the same thing here. What I meant was, I think it's a bug >> in udevtest. The same comment "/* remove sysfs_path if given */" is >> used in both udevtest and udevinfo. However, it only works in >> ude

Re: udevtest "Creating Custom Symlinks" page

2006-08-17 Thread Alex Merry
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:58:54PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > Right. I get the same thing here. What I meant was, I think it's a bug > in udevtest. The same comment "/* remove sysfs_path if given */" is > used in both udevtest and udevinfo. However, it only works in > udevinfo. The problem is t