On 8/4/06, Peter Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Book 6.2
6.57.2. Configuring Vim
from ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/ and and save them
^^^
Fixed now in trunk. Thanks, Peter. We'll backport this fix whenever
6.2.1 comes along.
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Coreutils Internationalization Fixes - Fixes various bugs with
multibyte character support
>>
No, no action required. Such big patches should be treated as
"switching to a fork", not as regular patches. Coreutils up
Piet Delaney wrote:
find: ./lfs-sources: Input/output error
./proc
./sys
find: ./sys: Input/output error
find: ./dev: Input/output error
Reburn. Use a CD-R blank instead of (less reliable) CD-RW.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://ww
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Linux UTF-8 Input - Fixes dead keys and copy/paste of non-ASCII
characters in UTF-8 mode on Linux console - Rejected upstream because it
changes the meaning of an existing ioctl - Drop the patch and replace it
with one that looks more likely to be accepted upstream.
On 8/6/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks.
A recent article on lwn.net discussing LFS
(http://lwn.net/Articles/192904/) attracted the following comment:
"...it's worrying the number of little patches that the LFS instructions
say need applying to the upstream source: why ar
On 8/4/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just a suggestion, but you should probably fix it in the 6.2 branch
> (or tag, whichever it is) as well, because I can't help but think
> with the release being a first-time thing for Bruc
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The LinuxFromScratch Team is proud to announce the release of LFS-6.2.
> This is the culmination of effort from a lot of contributors to the
> LFS Project.
>
> The book is available at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.2
> and check the web site for pdf and other ty
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 21:51 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:04 -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:57 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 00:16 -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
> We were wondering why there
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 10:18 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> The LFS LiveCD Team is proud to announce the release of the x86-6.2-1
> version of the LFS LiveCD. This version is built using LFS 6.2 and many
> BLFS packages from the SVN branch. Source packages for LFS 6.2, and the
> LFS book itse
I wait for this more than a day and meantime I miss the 17600 counter place.
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1859
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Matt wrote:
Texinfo Multibyte
A non-hackish solution requires full rewrite of character handling.
Way beyond my abilities. Will submit a bug report, though.
Thanks.
Vim Mandir
This is not LFS-specific. No known version of any Man-like program
searches in the
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Coreutils Internationalization Fixes - Fixes various bugs with multibyte
character support
>>
No, no action required. Such big patches should be treated as "switching
to a fork", not as regular patches. Coreutils upstream is already aware
Matthew Burgess wrote:
gabriel batir wrote:
I'm currently building LFS SVN-20060805.
I've followed the book, the only change is linux headers from CLFS and
CLFAGS=-Os -march=athlon.
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes250
# of unexpected failures22
I
gabriel batir wrote:
I'm currently building LFS SVN-20060805.
I've followed the book, the only change is linux headers from CLFS and
CLFAGS=-Os -march=athlon.
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes250
# of unexpected failures22
I'd try recompiling witho
I'm currently building LFS SVN-20060805.
I've followed the book, the only change is linux headers from CLFS and
CLFAGS=-Os -march=athlon.
Every check from 6.10. Re-adjusting the Toolchain appears to be correct.
I've compiled binutils 2.17 but wen I run make check I get this:
=== ld tests ===
S
I wrote:
Kbd Backspace - Makes Backspace and Delete keys consistent in all i386
keymaps - Not submitted because it's possibly incomplete - Submit
upstream. Complete or otherwise, it's better than nothing and I don't
think we've had any reports of broken keymaps for a while as the patch
hasn't
16 matches
Mail list logo
