Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> >
>> > it seems that the
>> > supported features for the way we build e2fsprogs-1.39 is:
>> >
>> > dir_prealloc, has_journal, imagic_inodes, ext_attr, dir_index,
>> > resize_inode, lazy_bg, sparse_s
On 7/19/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> it seems that the
> supported features for the way we build e2fsprogs-1.39 is:
>
> dir_prealloc, has_journal, imagic_inodes, ext_attr, dir_index,
> resize_inode, lazy_bg, sparse_super, large_file, filetype,
> needs_recove
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/17/06, George Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think that this note in the book should be updated to show that the
>> > has_journal output is expected, as it should be with an ext3
>> filesystem.
>>
>>
I was wondering what people thought about adding the note at the
bottom of the initial chroot page about remounting the kernel
filesystems to the bottom of the revised chroot page at the end of the
chapter. The two pages are here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/ch
On 7/17/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/17/06, George Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that this note in the book should be updated to show that the
> has_journal output is expected, as it should be with an ext3 filesystem.
Good point, George. I think this happened
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 07/19/06 06:37 CST:
>
>> The system boots and I have installed the following blfs packages:
>>
>> [snip list of 30 or so packages]
>>
>> Everything seems to work.
>
> I can confirm Miguel's report along with about 580 additional
> BLFS
Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 07/19/06 06:37 CST:
> The system boots and I have installed the following blfs packages:
>
> [snip list of 30 or so packages]
>
> Everything seems to work.
I can confirm Miguel's report along with about 580 additional
BLFS and Non-BLFS packages. :-)
--
Ra
Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Guys, in #lfs-support on irc I see 3 people building 6.2 -pre1 with
> glibc-2.4 right now. Now, those are the only 3 that said it, there may
> be more. The instructions work and it's not going to break anything
> while building the base system but, later when they try to run, m
Hello,
This is a report on my experience with LFS 6.2-pre1 so far.
Arch is i386 (pentium3, 800MHz). I built it with jhalfs, which went well
except for an initial glitch almost certainly caused by me.
Host is an LFS system built from SVN as of last november, slightly
suspicious because of said pr
