Re: Problems with FHS compliance.

2006-06-03 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
DJ Lucas wrote: One of my testing criteria is that the path includes only /bin and /sbin before $remote_fs is brought up. /usr/bin/find must be moved to /bin or the cleanfs script must be changed. I'm for moving find, or createfiles might get a few lines added to it in BLFS. :-) Debian has

Re: Problems with FHS compliance.

2006-06-03 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
DJ Lucas wrote: Next is the console script. Easiest solution is to move this after the network script. Alexander, you are most knowledgeable with console script. Is that acceptable or is there a requirement for it to be before the network script? If so, then openvt, kbd_mode, and setfont n

Problems with FHS compliance.

2006-06-03 Thread DJ Lucas
Recently it was brought up that we have a problem WRT /usr/share/man. I have two more WRT bootscripts. Specifically this bit from the FHS-2.3 for supporting these changes: This directory contains any non-essential binaries used exclusively by the system administrator. System administration pro

Re: Headers was RE: PROPOSAL -- new group to handle multi-project tasks

2006-06-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 6/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I 've been using David 's patches and Jim 's headers script on my new experimental build. As it has been said here already, there are two, fairly distinct patches: Cool. I was hoping that someone would play around with the David Woodhou

Re: Headers was RE: PROPOSAL -- new group to handle multi-project tasks

2006-06-03 Thread pak_lfs
Matthew Burgess: >Jim, please see the following messages from Linus: > ... >Now, these are all to do with cleaning up the headers, rather than the >original "make headers_install" proposal.  However, the Makefile target >will likely be added later on (and there's still plenty of time before >2.