El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 23:29, Jim Gifford escribió:
> The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are
> ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the
> author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but
> that's not keeping a
The biggest problem I've had about the md5sums in ALFS is that they are
ones we have created. We shouldn't be recreating them, but using the
author's version. I know we have repackages items so they are .bz2, but
that's not keeping a clean chain. That's my objection. If we are not
going to prov
On 5/4/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> the online user documentation explains
> this way better than I can and has some samples near the end.
>
> http://fontconfig.org/fontconfig-user.html
To me, that looks a lot like
file:///usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfi
Ioan Ionita wrote:
Ok, I feel like a complete retard. I decided to give jhalfs a spin,
but I can't figure out how to make the script run in the first place.
I don't get all the stuff about symlinks in the README. if I want to
build a Makefile for lfs, am I supposed to run ./lfs from the top
direc
Ioan Ionita wrote:
Ok, I feel like a complete retard. I decided to give jhalfs a spin,
but I can't figure out how to make the script run in the first place.
I don't get all the stuff about symlinks in the README. if I want to
build a Makefile for lfs, am I supposed to run ./lfs from the top
direc
Dan Nicholson wrote:
the online user documentation explains
this way better than I can and has some samples near the end.
http://fontconfig.org/fontconfig-user.html
To me, that looks a lot like
file:///usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.html or indeed
man fonts-conf
Andy
--
http://lin
Ok, I feel like a complete retard. I decided to give jhalfs a spin,
but I can't figure out how to make the script run in the first place.
I don't get all the stuff about symlinks in the README. if I want to
build a Makefile for lfs, am I supposed to run ./lfs from the top
directory? That file cont
El Jueves, 4 de Mayo de 2006 02:42, Archaic escribió:
> jhalfs was discussed in dozens of threads a long time ago. What you are
> arguing against is a method to test the book directly from it's XML.
And that was one of the goals listed in the specifications when the work on
the newxml format was
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Does the attached kernel patch help?
That patch (applied on a 2.6.16.13 kernel) fixes the warning from udevd.
But, strangely enough, it does not remove the bugreport. Neither does the
change in /etc/udev/rules.d/05-early.rules.
It's not exactly a critical problem for
On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I probably need to document that a little better. Basically you untar
your program and tell it ./headers_list iptables-1.3.5 and it creates a
report of all the headers needed for a build.
also below are results for ulog, a companion program to i
On 5/4/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I probably need to document that a little better. Basically you untar
your program and tell it ./headers_list iptables-1.3.5 and it creates a
report of all the headers needed for a build.
That makes more sense ;)
resulting asm-headers and linux
11 matches
Mail list logo
