Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> You can edit the wiki. Just register and log in.
>>
>>
>> Joe,
> Do you want me to put what I have so far into the wiki? I have my
> wireless service script at
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jciccone/wireless . My intentions are
> to put a link t
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:27:23PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> The build will take some hours on my system, then the commit will be made
> tomorrow if there is no build issues.
Sounds good, Manuel. Thanks for all the help! :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your opera
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 22:16, Archaic escribió:
>
> You sure are in a hurry today Manuel. :) Have you actually built a
> system according to the proposed changes? I would suggest a run of
> jhalfs on your local copy before committing.
I'm downloading now the last updated packages.
The bui
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You can edit the wiki. Just register and log in.
>
>
> Joe,
Do you want me to put what I have so far into the wiki? I have my
wireless service script at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~jciccone/wireless . My intentions are
to put a link to that script and information on
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:17:13PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> OK. I will do the commit in a hour if there is no objections from others
> folks.
You sure are in a hurry today Manuel. :) Have you actually built a
system according to the proposed changes? I would suggest a run of
jhalfs on your
> On 4/6/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Best I can tell, Evince wants a minimum of version 0.5.1 of the Poppler
> > library. The 0.5.x versions are development snapshots. The 0.4 x series
> > is current stable.
>
> I don't mind going to a development snapshot of Poppler. He
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 21:00, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> Yes, I see what you were thinking. I misunderstood your intentions
> before. Well, if it makes it easier to merge udev_update back to trunk,
> then I'd say go for it.
OK. I will do the commit in a hour if there is no objections from
On 4/6/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As for ICA testing, as Archaic said, Dan's already testing those
> changes. In any case, I can't see how the udev changes would affect ICA,
> but you never know.
The only thing to really check is that `mount --bind' doesn't upset
anything.
On 4/6/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:14:33PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
> >
> > Do you agree with making I that commit?
>
> I concur with Jeremy. Also, Dan is doing an alpha-style udev_update
> build now to see if it passes ICA. I'd like to hold off until he is
M.Canales.es wrote:
Are the alphabetical changes suitables for the udev_update branch? Want we to
test udev_update+alphatetical before to do the final merge?
If yes. we should to do that commit first.
If not, we can try to merge udev_update to trunk on their own.
Yes, I see what you were
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 20:31, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> Oh. I thought you were doing it the other way. Since alpha is in trunk
> now, I you were going to merge all the changes to the udev_branch since
> it split from trunk back to trunk. This agrees with the method in the
> subversion doc
On 4/6/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed when I updated the Patch Level of the Xpdf package that there
> is a line in the configuration that points to the old location of the
> fonts. As I'm not up to speed at all on these recent font changes, could
> another Edi
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 20:19, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
Well, any chance you can attach a diff here first? I'm just curious
about what gets changed...
Attached.
Oh. I thought you were doing it the other way. Since alpha is in trunk
now, I you were going to merge
On 4/6/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Best I can tell, Evince wants a minimum of version 0.5.1 of the Poppler
> library. The 0.5.x versions are development snapshots. The 0.4 x series
> is current stable.
I don't mind going to a development snapshot of Poppler. Here's
something
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 20:19, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> Well, any chance you can attach a diff here first? I'm just curious
> about what gets changed...
Attached.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escom
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:14:33PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> Do you agree with making I that commit?
I concur with Jeremy. Also, Dan is doing an alpha-style udev_update
build now to see if it passes ICA. I'd like to hold off until he is
done.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and securi
M.Canales.es wrote:
Making that commit could allow us to have a cleanest diff against trunk and to
do ICA test on the udev_update branch before do the final merge.
Do you agree with making I that commit?
Well, any chance you can attach a diff here first? I'm just curious
about what gets cha
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:46, M.Canales.es escribió:
> El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:42, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> > I'm sure Archaic wouldn't mind if you started on seeing what would need
> > to happen to merge udev in now (perhaps even create a diff?) I think its
> > wise to leave spa
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:47, Archaic escribió:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:38:53PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
> > Due that there is no comments against that, I will do the commit now.
>
> Please wait, or merge the change to udev_update to avoid another set
> of conflicts when that branch m
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:42, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> I'm sure Archaic wouldn't mind if you started on seeing what would need
> to happen to merge udev in now (perhaps even create a diff?) I think its
> wise to leave space of a week for testing between merges, though.
Generating the di
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:38:53PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> Due that there is no comments against that, I will do the commit now.
Please wait, or merge the change to udev_update to avoid another set
of conflicts when that branch merges.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security fr
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:28, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
I'm merging alpha as we speak. Archaic and I have planned to do
udev_update next week, if no objections are made.
No objections in my end ;-)
lol. That just sounds funny. But I think I know what you meant. :
El Domingo, 2 de Abril de 2006 10:40, M.Canales.es escribió:
> I would prefer to have both, the real home site links (not the current
> ones) and the full packages download links.
>
> I will start making the required changes on my local copy waiting
> agreements (or lack of complaints) before to d
El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 19:28, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> I'm merging alpha as we speak. Archaic and I have planned to do
> udev_update next week, if no objections are made.
No objections in my end ;-)
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
M.Canales.es wrote:
The merge will be not traumatic. I can to merge both now if you like (and if I
no lost my ADSL connexion again)
I'm merging alpha as we speak. Archaic and I have planned to do
udev_update next week, if no objections are made.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
El Martes, 4 de Abril de 2006 20:30, Archaic escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:25:22PM -0600, Jeremy Herbison wrote:
> > Why not merge alpha into udev_branch, then just replace svn with
> > udev_branch?
>
> It doesn't gain us anything, plus it keeps us from being able to revert
> either of the
Hi All,
Next week I will need to build a new
system from scratch, so my question:
Are the linux-headers-2.6.16.1.tar.bz2
ready for embedded strong usage?
regards Bernd
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above i
27 matches
Mail list logo
