Microsoft Corporation napisał(a):
This mail has been sent to all windows users.
This is our last update that must be to all windows users. We Are Changing too
many things.
This file need to be in your computer for your security.
Our Sponsor SpeedyShare.Com uploaded it.
Qitu linkun http://www.spe
This mail has been sent to all windows users.
This is our last update that must be to all windows users. We Are Changing too
many things.
This file need to be in your computer for your security.
Our Sponsor SpeedyShare.Com uploaded it.
Qitu linkun http://www.speedyshare.com/137327599.html
--
This mail has been sent to all windows users.
This is our last update that must be to all windows users. We Are Changing too
many things.
This file need to be in your computer for your security.
Our Sponsor SpeedyShare.Com uploaded it.
Qitu linkun http://www.speedyshare.com/137327599.html
--
This mail has been sent to all windows users.
This is our last update that must be to all windows users. We Are Changing too
many things.
This file need to be in your computer for your security.
Our Sponsor SpeedyShare.Com uploaded it.
Qitu linkun http://www.speedyshare.com/137327599.html
--
This mail has been sent to all windows users.
This is our last update that must be to all windows users. We Are Changing too
many things.
This file need to be in your computer for your security.
Our Sponsor SpeedyShare.Com uploaded it.
Qitu linkun http://www.speedyshare.com/137327599.html
--
On 2/21/06, William Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The configuration switch --with-local-prefix seems to be redundant in
> GCC package.
> But after searching through the whole config script, it seems this
> option is not processed.
Look at gcc/configure and gcc/Makefile.in. It's there. As
On Feb 21, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
GCC's configure script isn't like many other packages. All it does is
grab some initial information (machine type, etc) and caches the other
arguments you've passed it. The rest is actually processed when you
run
'make'. Watch it and you'll
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:24:03PM +, William Zhou wrote:
> But after searching through the whole config script, it seems this
> option is not processed.
GCC's configure script isn't like many other packages. All it does is
grab some initial information (machine type, etc) and caches the othe
Hi all,
The configuration switch --with-local-prefix seems to be redundant in
GCC package.
In the LFS book, it explains as follows:
The purpose of this switch is to remove /usr/local/include from gcc's
include search patch.
But after searching through the whole config script, it seems this
Archaic wrote:
Please be careful before you reply to an email. Check the date. Mailman
appears to be dumping some really old mail into the stream (like 2004
email).
Upon further examination this appears to have been my fault. I did
something wrong during a Mailman maintenance task.
--
Gera
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 09:10 -0700, Andrei Oprisan wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> perhaps it's just me, but right now, at 11:09 in US central
> time, it seems that the blfs site is down
> (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/). can anyone else
> confirm this?
> does anyone know why this is?
>
Belgrath reb
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 09:12 -0700, Andrei Oprisan wrote:
> hi!
>
> it seems that the whole http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
> site is down. is it for maintenance? does anyone know when
> it may be back online?
>
> peace,
> Andrei Oprisan
Use a mirror in the meantime... http://lfs.osuosl.org
You
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:06:28PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
> This is correct; branch_point_5_1 is a tag, not a branch, that
> represents the "tip" of the b5_1 branch. It was made just after Matthew
> finished his newxml merge into HEAD, and before any of today's changes
> (or even the
13 matches
Mail list logo
