Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Can someone fix this, especially the first point. The first one is
easy, just remove the line "ln -sv soelim /usr/bin/zsoelim" from
groff's page.
Tush, would you mind bugzillaing these so I/we don't forget about them
(again!).
Thanks,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratc
Ken Moffat wrote:
This only affects clfs at the moment (lfs is still using an older
version of udev). A lot of people are reporting 'udevsend: main: error
sending message: Connection refused' messages, I've now tracked it down
and discovered that our (clfs) hotplug is not working (specificall
Dan wrote:
> Just a note to both groups that the expect-5.43.0 tarball is back up
> at http://expect.nist.gov/ . Here's what the maintainer had to say.
>
> Dan
Sweet. :) Thanks for the followup, Dan. :)
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.li
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:33:54AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Just a note to both groups that the expect-5.43.0 tarball is back up
> at http://expect.nist.gov/ . Here's what the maintainer had to say.
Thanks for following through on this Dan. :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l
Just a note to both groups that the expect-5.43.0 tarball is back up
at http://expect.nist.gov/ . Here's what the maintainer had to say.
Dan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Don Libes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 2, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: expect-5.43.0 tarball missing from nist
On 2/2/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > This issue has come up a few times now. I have no idea why they took
> > 5.43.0 of the expect web site. We have to fix this issue. The link
> > in the book needs to be changed to a local copy on one of the LFS
>
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Hi,
My apologies if this isn't the proper forwarding technique from one
list to the other.
This issue has come up a few times now. I have no idea why they took
5.43.0 of the expect web site. We have to fix this issue. The link
in the book needs to be changed to a local c
Hi,
My apologies if this isn't the proper forwarding technique from one
list to the other.
This issue has come up a few times now. I have no idea why they took
5.43.0 of the expect web site. We have to fix this issue. The link
in the book needs to be changed to a local copy on one of the LFS
m
stephan sperber wrote:
i dont really know if thats the same issue, but here is a link from lkml
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/31/22
in this link is mentioned (if my poor english gets it right) that udev --
daemon isnt needed.
They say "udevstart is not needed", not "udevd --daemon is not neede
