[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the
>> user about config.site, and the book already sets other variables at
>
>
> Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand
> needin
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
The CLFS Project.
Cross Linux From Scratch is a book dedicated to building on various
architectures. Currently we have Alpha, Sparc, PowerPC, x86, and x86_64
architectures in the book.
Cross LFS will teach you how to build a cross architecture toolcha
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the
user about config.site, and the book already sets other variables at
Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand
needing to teach them about configure...
Ste
On Nov 1, 2005, at 6:06 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
But that's not the only way of doing an initramfs. You can also
create
a control file that refers to the files on your system, in their
current
directories, and when you "make" the kernel, it'll pull the files from
wherever they currently ar
Jim Gifford wrote:
> Have they ever figured out how when your build a kernel to add the
> modules that your building into the initramf? So you can have a
> complete modular system?
I don't know. If modules_install would get run before the initramfs
image creation, then you could use the /lib/mod
Zachary Kotlarek wrote:
> You're right -- I didn't realize there was a difference. But none of
> differences you highlight really change my point.
This is true. I realize now it sounds like I was using them as rebuttal
points, but that wasn't the intention. I was just trying to point out
why an
Steve Prior wrote:
The Glibc 2.3.4 patch (which solves the ssh issue) doesn't seem to be
listed among the bugs - has it been included anyway?
Yes, there were a couple of the errata entries that we just dealt with
without putting them into bugzilla first, which is why the glibc problem
doesn
On 11/1/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/31/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In any case, it might be useful for KDE or possibly Gnome where there
> > are related packages, but its usefulness seems to be a bit limited for
> > LFS in general.
>
> I think this would
On 10/31/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, it might be useful for KDE or possibly Gnome where there
> are related packages, but its usefulness seems to be a bit limited for
> LFS in general.
I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the
user about conf
